<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Laptops and PDAs may be detained at the border</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/your-electronic-devices-including-your-laptops-may-be-detained-at-the-border/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/your-electronic-devices-including-your-laptops-may-be-detained-at-the-border/</link>
	<description>The last honest travel site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirill Furman</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/your-electronic-devices-including-your-laptops-may-be-detained-at-the-border/comment-page-1/#comment-5002</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirill Furman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=5136#comment-5002</guid>
		<description>We have to stop the expanding government attack on our privacy.
It has nothing to do with terrorism. It is just another stupid idea generated inside DHS paid by our taxes.

Anybody who feels that this policy is ridiculous should do class action against it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have to stop the expanding government attack on our privacy.<br />
It has nothing to do with terrorism. It is just another stupid idea generated inside DHS paid by our taxes.</p>
<p>Anybody who feels that this policy is ridiculous should do class action against it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce king</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/your-electronic-devices-including-your-laptops-may-be-detained-at-the-border/comment-page-1/#comment-4990</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce king</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=5136#comment-4990</guid>
		<description>Seizure without reasonable cause and retain for an indefinite time? What country is this again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seizure without reasonable cause and retain for an indefinite time? What country is this again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hapgood</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/your-electronic-devices-including-your-laptops-may-be-detained-at-the-border/comment-page-1/#comment-4989</link>
		<dc:creator>Hapgood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=5136#comment-4989</guid>
		<description>The hopeful thing here is that, unlike most &quot;security&quot; measures that affect ordinary sheeple who have no recourse when their liberty or privacy are trampled, this one is likely to affect business people who could be politically well-connected. All it takes is for one lobbyist or donor to have a laptop seized, and Congress will finally rouse from its torpor. 

While Customs and Homeland Security surely need the power to interdict suspected terrorists, the unlimited authority to arbitrarily confiscate electronic devices (the policy announcement makes no mention at all of returning the property to people deemed innocent) and conduct open-ended fishing expeditions for any possible violation goes well beyond &quot;protecting the borders.&quot; 

How does a nation whose officials have this authority really differ from the former Soviet Union or any other totalitarian regime? I hope Congress acts to stop this abuse, although their track record of kowtowing to every &quot;security&quot; whim of the Bush administration isn&#039;t encouraging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hopeful thing here is that, unlike most &#8220;security&#8221; measures that affect ordinary sheeple who have no recourse when their liberty or privacy are trampled, this one is likely to affect business people who could be politically well-connected. All it takes is for one lobbyist or donor to have a laptop seized, and Congress will finally rouse from its torpor. </p>
<p>While Customs and Homeland Security surely need the power to interdict suspected terrorists, the unlimited authority to arbitrarily confiscate electronic devices (the policy announcement makes no mention at all of returning the property to people deemed innocent) and conduct open-ended fishing expeditions for any possible violation goes well beyond &#8220;protecting the borders.&#8221; </p>
<p>How does a nation whose officials have this authority really differ from the former Soviet Union or any other totalitarian regime? I hope Congress acts to stop this abuse, although their track record of kowtowing to every &#8220;security&#8221; whim of the Bush administration isn&#8217;t encouraging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

