With air security, travelers are flying blind

by Christopher Elliott on December 2, 2009

IMG_9923The Transportation Security Administration likes to keep terrorists guessing. Apparently, it likes to keep travelers guessing, too.

And we do. Shoes on — or off? Laptop computer in the bag — or on the conveyor belt? And tickets: middle name, middle initial or just first and last? Oh, and are they going to pull you over at the gate for additional screening?

“We don’t want to be consistent,” TSA spokeswoman Lauren Gaches told me. “We want to be flexible. We don’t want a checklist mentality. If we are predictable, it could become easier for someone who wants to do us harm to figure out the system.”

A little context is in order. Gaches and I were talking about TSA officers’ essential ability to use their discretion during the screening process, and why some of them, for example, allow a half-empty tube of Crest in a carry-on bag to slide through but will pull aside travelers for no reason other than that they think they look suspicious.

There’s no denying that air travelers are often perplexed by the screening process.

Last year, for instance, TSA officers at North Dakota’s Grand Forks International Airport told Susan Jean Schostag that she could pack a few jars of peanut butter in her carry-on luggage. (Why on Earth would anyone bring 16 ounces of Skippy on a plane? Schostag, an administrative assistant who lives in Grand Forks, was flying to Germany. And if you’ve ever lived in Germany, you know it’s almost impossible to find good peanut butter there.)

But this fall, a TSA agent at the same airport told her that peanut butter was verboten in carry-on bags. “We know about the liquid rule, of course,” Schostag said. “But this is just stupid.”

Or how about Kenneth Akin — actually, make that Kenneth Alexander Akin Jr., a retiree from Sierra Vista, Ariz. His name is the problem. “I’m not really sure what the hell TSA is asking for and what the airlines are doing,” he told me. He’s flying to Mexico this month and can’t figure out what name should be on his airline ticket.

In preparation for TSA’s Secure Flight program, which is intended to streamline the watchlist matching process and is now being put into effect, his airline asked him to update his frequent flier accounts with his full legal name as it appears on his ID. But that’s easier said than done. The name fields allowed him to revise his account only to add a middle name, but no “Jr.” “When I tried to do ‘Akin, Jr.’ I got a minus on my report card,” he said.

Airlines grading passengers? What’s this world coming to?

“So TSA wants full name, but the airlines do not develop the form to input the full name,” Akin said.

There are perfectly good explanations for both of those apparent inconsistencies. Secure Flight, the TSA will tell you, is a work in progress, and the agency’s liquid-and-gel rules are clearly spelled out on its Web site. (How they’re interpreted — well, that’s another story.)

I asked security expert Bruce Schneier, one of the TSA’s most outspoken critics, why air travelers continue to be confounded by the rules. “Because,” he said, “they’re confusing.”

He doesn’t see the point to the airport screening theater. “If you try to figure out the point, you’ll be frustrated,” he told me.

Maybe the TSA is a little confused, too. Try working for an agency where you have to be transparent, yet at the same time opaque; where customers expect consistency but you need to stay unpredictable; and where the only real measure of success is when nothing happens. No wonder the agency has an alarmingly high turnover rate among senior executives, according to a recent U.S. Government Accountability Office report.

I can’t be objective or even consistent on the subject of the TSA and the way it treats air travelers. I’ve been covering this agency from the beginning, and in the eight years since its creation, I’ve criticized it, praised it, ridiculed it, called for more funding and for it to be de-funded. If TSA has been consistent about one thing, it’s the way in which it mystifies the travelers it’s supposed to protect.

You want a quick fix? Sorry. My best advice is to expect the unexpected when you arrive at the airport. Give yourself more time than they say you need. Put everything on the conveyor belt. Be prepared for a secondary screening, a frisking, a game of 20 Questions.

That’s how the TSA likes it.

(Photo: Alex E. Proimos/Flickr Creative Commons)

Print Friendly

  • gharkness

    “Why would anyone want to bring 16-ounces of peanut butter on a plane?”

    Because THEY DON’T FEED YOU. Peanut butter is long-lasting, high-energy, filling, cheap and tasty. It also doesn’t take up a lot of room. I always bring peanut butter, because I do NOT do hungry very well, and getting stuck on the tarmac for 10+ hours -or who knows how many more – is not appealing.

  • Hapgood

    Let’s see…. even the TSA’s leadership are fully aware that their agency is incapable of doing anything consistently. They’re also fully aware that many passengers who personally experience the confusion, frustration, and difficulty that results from the inconsistency will quickly figure that out for themselves, which will then lead them to commit the unpardonable offense of asking embarrassing questions about the TSA’s effectiveness.

    The TSA’s leadership does not want to do anything to fix numerous flaws and problems that by now are glaringly obvious to millions of people who have seen repeatedly. To do that would be admitting that they’ve made mistakes, which they are incapable of admitting. For admitting any fallibility will undermine the blind faith and trust we’re all supposed to have that the TSA provides highly effective protection from unspeakable horrors.

    So they address the problems in the only fashion they find acceptable. Whenever anyone points out the obvious fact that TSA screening is nothing more than the inconsistent and arbitrary “implementation” of confusing rules, their PR flaks immediately respond by claiming that the inconsistency is actually a powerful and highly effective strategy against wily terrorists. If passengers can’t figure out what rules are in effect at that moment, at that checkpoint, with that screener, then it’s an irrefutable fact that any terrorist who somehow stumbles into a checkpoint won’t know either. That’s what keeps us safe. Very safe. As long as we Believe, and don’t ask questions that only give aid and comfort to the enemy, we’ll all be safe and protected.

  • Puzzled

    Their inconsistency leaves even experienced travelers feeling muddled. A couple of months ago PDX required that shoes be placed on the conveyor belt – NOT in the bin. Of course, no other airport I encountered on that trip had the same requirement and the TSA folks elsewhere looked at me as though I was stupid to ask if the shoes went in the bin or on the belt… Fast forward to November – PDX has removed all the signs reminding us to put our shoes on the belt and, indeed, requires that all shoes go in the bins.

    Frankly, I don’t care where my shoes go but I am rather curious as to what security purpose is served by these seemingly random changes. In my experience, all it seems to do is slow things down as travelers try to sort out this month’s rules from last month’s rules…

  • http://consumertraveler.com jbfrombremerton

    The “reasonable man theory” has most assuredly been taken out of the TSA’s mindset. I travel frequently and I always receive a “thank you for your service” when I present my picture ID to the picture/face/name checkers. Then I go inside the security area where homemade blackbery jam (a present for my 85 year old mother) is confiscated. I am rather rudely told not to place my shoes in the bin because the conveyor belt is the place for shoes. Nevermind that last week I was told the opposite. Then I’m instructed to remove my belt because the buckle which is the size of my thumb “might set off the detector”. Right ahead of me a cowboy with a belt buckle the size of Dallas just waltzed through the same machine and it did not sound an alarm. I view with amazement and disgust as an elderly, wheel chair bound senior citizen with a “World War II Veteran” ball cap is yanked out of his chair and made to stand on his wobbly legs while a wand is slowly waved over every square inch of his frail body. I see another older woman trying to avoid the wand because she has a heart pacemaker which her physician says should not be subjected to the device patiently explaining that she requires a pat-down search to an agent whose native language is not English and he has no clue as to what she is saying. I see another senior citizen being yanked aside because she has a sandwich in her carry-on and a agriculture dog has alerted its handler as to its presence. None of us fit the “profile” of the 17-40 year old Middle Eastern complexioned males who have been responsible for so many terrorist acts. Yet I see Muslim women with only their eyes poking out of their clothing being allowed to pass through security checkpoints with little to no acknowledgment that they are there. I see other Muslim attired airport concession employees who have very limited command of the English language flashing a badge and being allowed to pass through the security screen without being required to remove their shoes. Add to all this the frustration of observing the person manning the scanning device who is carrying on a conversation with a fellow TSA employee and not paying any attention to his screen as the conveyor belt passes through the machine. Lord help me if I make an issue out of that at that moment! Don’t even get me started when the subject of screening mothers with babies and toddlers comes up. Also, why is it that in some airports we have to repeat the “security” drill a second time when making a connecting flight?

Previous post:

Next post: