<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s in a load factor?  Yes, planes really are full these days.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/whats-in-a-load-factor-yes-planes-really-are-full-these-days/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/whats-in-a-load-factor-yes-planes-really-are-full-these-days/</link>
	<description>The last honest travel site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/whats-in-a-load-factor-yes-planes-really-are-full-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-14461</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=17414#comment-14461</guid>
		<description>Hapgood August 11, 2009 at 10:45 am 
Everyone repeat after me: “Amtrak! Greyhound! Road Trip! Staycation!”
==========================================================

Just checked Amtrak.  NYC to Orlando.  $150 one way.
Just checked Jetblue:  NYC to Orlando.  $79 one way.

Repeat after me, sit on the train for 23 HOURS and for almost $70 dollars MORE!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hapgood August 11, 2009 at 10:45 am<br />
Everyone repeat after me: “Amtrak! Greyhound! Road Trip! Staycation!”<br />
==========================================================</p>
<p>Just checked Amtrak.  NYC to Orlando.  $150 one way.<br />
Just checked Jetblue:  NYC to Orlando.  $79 one way.</p>
<p>Repeat after me, sit on the train for 23 HOURS and for almost $70 dollars MORE!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/whats-in-a-load-factor-yes-planes-really-are-full-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-14457</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=17414#comment-14457</guid>
		<description>Would be nice if they could eke out  a good profit at those load factors.   Profits make it far easier to run a business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be nice if they could eke out  a good profit at those load factors.   Profits make it far easier to run a business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hapgood</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/whats-in-a-load-factor-yes-planes-really-are-full-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-14448</link>
		<dc:creator>Hapgood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=17414#comment-14448</guid>
		<description>Everyone repeat after me: &quot;Amtrak! Greyhound! Road Trip! Staycation!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone repeat after me: &#8220;Amtrak! Greyhound! Road Trip! Staycation!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M.</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/whats-in-a-load-factor-yes-planes-really-are-full-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-14445</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=17414#comment-14445</guid>
		<description>Yet even with 90% load factors, the airlines are still losing money. Kind of tells you that something else has to change, either higher base fares, or other cost reductions that haven&#039;t already been taken. Maybe going back to some form of regulation would allow the airlines to stop competing each other to death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet even with 90% load factors, the airlines are still losing money. Kind of tells you that something else has to change, either higher base fares, or other cost reductions that haven&#8217;t already been taken. Maybe going back to some form of regulation would allow the airlines to stop competing each other to death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/whats-in-a-load-factor-yes-planes-really-are-full-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-14442</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=17414#comment-14442</guid>
		<description>And yes, many airline employees do actually commute to their jobs on their own airlines. It’s called “deadheading.” And while they, unlike paying passengers, can sometimes sit in a “jump-seat” in the plane’s galleys or cockpit, they will fill a regular seat if it’s available.
============================================================

Actually, it&#039;s called non-reving.  &quot;Deadheading&quot; pertains to a crewmember who occupies a seat, but is not working the flight.  They are positioning for a trip downline.  The seat is held from inventory for the crewmember and is NOT on a standby basis.  You get paid for deadheading.  Non-reving is using your flight benefits to get from point A to point B on a standby basis.  (flying free)

Over the years, I&#039;ve laughed at this comment:  Planes are packed, packed to the gills.  Well, that&#039;s THE IDEA.  Fill the plane up and try to make a profit out of it.  Imagine that, just like any other business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yes, many airline employees do actually commute to their jobs on their own airlines. It’s called “deadheading.” And while they, unlike paying passengers, can sometimes sit in a “jump-seat” in the plane’s galleys or cockpit, they will fill a regular seat if it’s available.<br />
============================================================</p>
<p>Actually, it&#8217;s called non-reving.  &#8220;Deadheading&#8221; pertains to a crewmember who occupies a seat, but is not working the flight.  They are positioning for a trip downline.  The seat is held from inventory for the crewmember and is NOT on a standby basis.  You get paid for deadheading.  Non-reving is using your flight benefits to get from point A to point B on a standby basis.  (flying free)</p>
<p>Over the years, I&#8217;ve laughed at this comment:  Planes are packed, packed to the gills.  Well, that&#8217;s THE IDEA.  Fill the plane up and try to make a profit out of it.  Imagine that, just like any other business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

