<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To save fuel, should planes fly unpainted? Here&#8217;s the surprising answer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/weight-of-airplane-paint-does-it-make-a-difference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/weight-of-airplane-paint-does-it-make-a-difference/</link>
	<description>The last honest travel site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:53:17 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maccess</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/weight-of-airplane-paint-does-it-make-a-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-9691</link>
		<dc:creator>Maccess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=5287#comment-9691</guid>
		<description>Buffing unpainted aircraft can be done in low labor cost States our outsourced to foreign airports that have excellent aircraft ground support facilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buffing unpainted aircraft can be done in low labor cost States our outsourced to foreign airports that have excellent aircraft ground support facilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PlanetEye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; No-Frills Airlines Emerging</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/weight-of-airplane-paint-does-it-make-a-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-7477</link>
		<dc:creator>PlanetEye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; No-Frills Airlines Emerging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=5287#comment-7477</guid>
		<description>[...] there&#8217;s some people within the industry who suggest that more airlines - like American Airlines - should think about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there&#8217;s some people within the industry who suggest that more airlines &#8211; like American Airlines &#8211; should think about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turtletrot1</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/weight-of-airplane-paint-does-it-make-a-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-5901</link>
		<dc:creator>turtletrot1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=5287#comment-5901</guid>
		<description>I am a senior...and then some.  Didn&#039;t we do this in the 70&#039;s during the first gas crisis?  I am sure we did.  Shiny planes.  Not as much drag !
(Don&#039;t tell me I am losing it...I am really sure this has been done before.  Must be in archives somewhere.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a senior&#8230;and then some.  Didn&#8217;t we do this in the 70&#8217;s during the first gas crisis?  I am sure we did.  Shiny planes.  Not as much drag !<br />
(Don&#8217;t tell me I am losing it&#8230;I am really sure this has been done before.  Must be in archives somewhere.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prof Burgos</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/weight-of-airplane-paint-does-it-make-a-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-5874</link>
		<dc:creator>Prof Burgos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=5287#comment-5874</guid>
		<description>Charlie: As a fellow former army guy, you&#039;ll recall that during WWII the USAAF abandoned the camouflage painting of aircraft (bombers and fighters alike) around 1943-1944 in favor of natural metal, because you could eke out a few extra miles per hour and miles of flight from a natural metal finish -- no paint, less weight, smoother airflow, greater aircraft efficiency. 

But then they had enlisted men to do the polishing, who made the same money whether they peeled spuds or buffed a canopy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie: As a fellow former army guy, you&#8217;ll recall that during WWII the USAAF abandoned the camouflage painting of aircraft (bombers and fighters alike) around 1943-1944 in favor of natural metal, because you could eke out a few extra miles per hour and miles of flight from a natural metal finish &#8212; no paint, less weight, smoother airflow, greater aircraft efficiency. </p>
<p>But then they had enlisted men to do the polishing, who made the same money whether they peeled spuds or buffed a canopy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
