Traveling while gay

by Laura Townsend Elion on November 24, 2009

Lesbian_hands
Most of us decide where to visit based on many factors, like expense, amenities, cultural experiences, landscape. But I recently decided to ask friends of mine who are gay what they look for in a vacation.

I asked them a series of questions I hoped would provide better insight into how they decide where to travel and what happens when they do. Some of those questions are listed below, and the most frequent answers provided are summarized in parentheses. Other question topics are discussed within the article.

1) Do you feel you approach travel planning any differently than straight folks? (Sometimes, as in planning gay-oriented vacations, and – for one couple – being childless, we tend to look for more adult venues).

2) What do you look for first in a destination? (Someplace we will be comfortable that satisfies a curiosity of some type – art, history, culture or gay-related).

3) Do you weigh consideration of how accepted you and your partner will be in that community? (Yes)

4) Do you travel as an openly gay couple, or do you conceal that fact? (Open, but not obvious)

5) Do you prefer to vacation in groups catering to gays, such as gay cruises and sponsored events? (Take at least one gay-themed vacation a year in order to be free of inhibitions and self-censorship)

6) Have you ever used a travel agent or service specializing in gay travel? (Yes – was particularly helpful the first time seeking a gay cruise)

7) Do you consult with gay-centric newspapers and guide books to inform your decisions? (Yes, everywhere we go!)

For the record, it’s estimated that the gay travel market represents $47.3 billion dollars – that’s billion with a “B” – and accounts for approximately 10% of all travel dollars. Many vendors and communities are increasingly and aggressively courting this demographic. While a straight person might immediately name San Francisco, Key West, Miami and Providence, RI as prime spots for gay couples to congregate in, places as diverse as Quebec, ON, Puerto Rico, France and Disney World have gotten serious about welcoming gays and lesbians.

In my research I found that the most frequent complaint gay couples had was about hospitality staff members assuming they were business associates and/or relatives and not partners. This can lead to some embarrassment when the clerk reading a reservation with a single bed decides there’s been a mistake. This may be why some homosexual couples prefer to travel to locations renowned for accepting, or even celebrating, alternative lifestyles.

But just as a European eventually wants to see beyond their Old World borders, most gay travelers tell me that first and foremost, they want to experience the world around them for the exact same reasons that straight folks do – to see that fabulous museum, visit an ancient site, or ski, scuba, bike or hike that great destination. Doing that in an environment where they feel free to explore without prejudice, is, unfortunately, often seen as icing on the cake.

There are still large parts of the world where homosexuality is frowned upon or even against the law. Some countries are surprising schizophrenic – Belize, Grenada, Jamaica and Fiji are among those that outlaw relations between men, but not women. And the penalties can be harsh –in the popular close-by islands of Antigua and Barbados, homosexuality is punishable by up 15 years imprisonment. In Guyana, male partners risk life in jail. Although Americans like to think of themselves as tolerant and modern, consider this: homosexuality has never been against the law in Viet Nam. (The U.S. did not make homosexuality legal in all states until a 2003 Supreme Court ruling – that does not apply to the armed services, which are treated as a separate case).

So, I asked my friends, would you risk traveling to such a location if it housed an event or site you really wanted to see? Most were non-committal, saying it depended on too many individual parameters. At least person said that fear of strict laws and harsh repercussions would deter them.

I also asked, do you ever avoid areas that have been in the news, or are noted for, anti-gay acts or attitudes? The consensus seemed to be they would travel there but try not to draw attention to their sexual orientation. Interestingly enough, in my sample audience, locations known for encouraging gay rights (such as legal marriage) did not appear to have any additional appeal to travelers, unless the intent was to marry.

Another criticism I’ve heard in the past is that travel specialists and resort staffs stereotype gays – expecting all gay men to be feminine and assuming lesbian women won’t appreciate spa services. Since the gay community is comprised of a very diverse group, innkeepers, resorts, and travel specialists fall into the same trap in stereotyping them as they do with any other gross over-generalization.

My focus group of friends agreed that the best way to attract gay tourists was simply to be the best whitewater rafting company or spa resort possible, and to treat clients with dignity and without assumptions. As one member put it, “Like anyone else, we appreciate quality, good service and great value.” Apparently there’s been a lot of progress – in general, many of my gay friends could not recall being overtly discriminated against because of their sexual orientation. Either that, or they just choose their locations wisely.

I then asked my friends to name some places they would recommend to other gay men or women, and to explain why the experience was remarkable. Was it because the locals were non-judgmental, or because the sights themselves made-up for any perceived bias? And, of course, what was your worst experience?

The group was divided on some aspects of this.

Many said they felt their recommendations would be the same as almost any traveler, emphasizing that they aren’t very different from others in their travel desires – wanting to see famous sites and enjoy pleasurable accommodations. They tend to book from mainstream travel sources and visit the same, generally popular, destinations without a thought about the gay aspect. They talked about vacations that were great because they finally saw the Mona Lisa or took that wine tasting tour.

Others felt gay-specific vacations definitely provided a superior travel experience and one they would highly recommend. This group stated that they prefer at least occasionally to travel in the company of fellow homosexuals or pick resorts, cruises or other options offered especially to them because they like the immense freedom and no stress factor. Singles overwhelming chose areas known for gay nightclubs and entertainment in much the same way that straight males flock to certain infamous Spring Break locales.

The funniest answer came from a male friend describing his worst experience ever. The facility didn’t seem to care about any guests – an attitude that, in some twisted fashion, was reassuring. He explains, “We booked a suite, but they didn’t have the type we reserved. Many clerks would have looked across the counter and offered two separate rooms. This guy said the facility had one ‘mini-suite’ left, and we could take it or leave it. Not having to explain we were romantic partners in a crowded lobby was a welcome relief – even if he made the offer because the hotel was cheap, not sensitive.” The rest of his description mirrors many of the vacations horrors we’ve all had (gay or straight) – a hurricane, no electricity, a misunderstanding on the bill.

Like all minorities, the gay community often finds itself stereotyped, insulted and unwelcome — in life, and on vacation. Putting up with such behavior when you’re supposed to be on holiday should be unacceptable, but the reality is that many gays still face daunting decisions about how and where to spend their leisure time.

However, one friend provided a quote that is as hopeful as it is refreshing: “We have generally found that within this country, even when we are in areas thought to be very anti-gay, we are not disrespected. My expectations for how challenging life would be as a gay man as I embarked on coming out have never been met. Non-gay people the world over rise well above the behavior that the stereotypical expectation would predict.”

And that I think says it best – once we all get beyond the stereotypes, we can discover how truly alike we are, and have some fun.

The audience is invited to share their thoughts and suggestions, as well as any stories about their travel experiences.

Share:
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

{ 1 trackback }

uberVU - social comments
November 24, 2009 at 7:24 pm

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

frank November 24, 2009 at 3:35 pm

Thorough article. The gay community has great experience in traveling. Most have incomes that allow them to travel often. Several airlines have been wise to advertise to the gay community. You see it all over the internet. http://www.gay.com has a travel section which airlines heavily cater to with advertisements. And, of course, there are many destinations where the gay community feels welcome. Ie. Key West, Miami, New York City, San Francisco, etc.

Hapgood November 24, 2009 at 6:54 pm

This article could apply just as well to any “demographic” other than the (heterosexual) couples and families that the leisure travel industry seems to exclusively serve. Substitute “solo,” “disabled,” or possibly even “senior” or “single parent” for “gay,” and most of the article still reads sensibly and resonates.

The real lesson is that we’re no longer in the 1950s. The industry needs to learn that their shareholders are best served by extending the same welcome to the full diversity of travelers as they’re accustomed to giving “traditional” couples and families.

Frank November 24, 2009 at 11:56 pm

Hapgood November 24, 2009 at 6:54 pm
This article could apply just as well to any “demographic” other than the (heterosexual) couples and families that the leisure travel industry seems to exclusively serve.
==========================================

Like all minorities, the gay community often finds itself stereotyped, insulted and unwelcome — in life, and on vacation. Putting up with such behavior when you’re supposed to be on holiday should be unacceptable, but the reality is that many gays still face daunting decisions about how and where to spend their leisure time.
=============================================

interesting, what other demographic is discriminated like this when traveling???????

Frank November 25, 2009 at 11:52 am

Let’s begin at HOME first:
1138.
That’s the number of federal rights GAY PEOPLE are missing because they can’t get married.

Hapgood November 25, 2009 at 12:20 pm

Frank: “interesting, what other demographic is discriminated like this when traveling???????”

The solo leisure traveler, for one. The “supplement” for single occupancy on cruises can end up costing singles as much as three times what a member of a couple pays. Restaurants in tourist locations sometimes won’t take reservations for one, or will let a solo diner sit and watch walk-in couples and families get seated immediately, until they finally get the message that they’re not welcome. And travel brochures that gush effusively over what a destination offers for couples and families never seem to mention the solo traveler at all. And, of course, hotels charge a single guest the same as a couple.

That’s not the same as the legal and often life-threatening discrimination accorded gays and lesbians (and as far as I know there’s no jurisdication that has laws against solo travelers), it’s still discrimination.

Also, I simply stated that the travel industry needs to welcome all manner of customers who aren’t traveling in “traditional” couples and families. If you disagree with that statement, why?

Frank November 25, 2009 at 2:35 pm

Hapgood November 25, 2009 at 12:20 pm
If you disagree with that statement, why?
===============================================

NOT ANYMORE……………you nailed it, right here:

That’s not the same as the legal and often life-threatening discrimination accorded gays and lesbians (and as far as I know there’s no jurisdication that has laws against solo travelers), it’s still discrimination.

Kevin M November 27, 2009 at 7:50 pm

@Hapgood: I think you may misunderstand a bit the difference between discrimination and package pricing.

“Single supplements” are generally levied only in the cases of packaged travel where the pricing is based on the assumption that, say, there will be two people sharing a hotel room or cabin on a cruise. For a tour which includes lodging, that’s understandable: the tour company has to plan how many rooms are needed, and the pricing has to be based on a standard assumption – so most go with the double-occupancy idea. A single person traveling alone on such a tour incurs as much “cost” to the tour company as a couple, and gets as much space as the couple does. But since the tour is priced “per person”, the single supplement is charged to recover that extra lodging cost.

Likewise on a cruise ship, the ship bases its pricing on selling a certain percentage of its lodging space. A single person occupying a cabin that’s designed to accommodate two-revenue paying passengers is, in effect, depriving the ship of the opportunity to sell another fare on the ship. Given the additional revenue-making opportunities per passenger on a ship, that can mean more than the extra cost of the cabin.

Hotels rent rooms, not sleeping spots; it doesn’t generally cost much more in terms of cleaning, etc. to maintain a room occupied by two people instead of one person. So I don’t see it as discrimination to charge by the room, regardless of whether there are one or two people in the room.

Contrast that with hotels (uncommon here, but more common in other countries) with either one double bed or two twin beds, refusing to rent a double-bed room to two men or two women. Or a restaurant kicking a male couple out because they kiss – lightly – when they arrive at the place. That’s discrimination.

At least we’ve progressed somewhat – I can remember some friends taking a carriage tour of the New Orleans French Quarter back in the early 1990’s and the driver was describing the sites as they went by – “That’s the house where so-and-so wrote thus-and-such book… That’s the site of the old St. Louis Hotel, once the grandest hotel in the city” and so forth. At one point, they rounded a corner and the driver tossed out “And over is a gay bar where you can go get AIDS”.

Now, I agree that a restaurant who won’t seat a party of one (especially if they have tables that seat just two people) are discriminating, but even then, it’s primarily economic rather than personal. Tables of one produce less than half the revenue of a table of two, on average (single people rarely order a bottle of wine or an appetizer to split, for instance) but take almost as much serving work. I agree the single person should be served, and with dignity, but at least there’s an understandable reason for it other than personal bias. Incidentally, one reason couples and larger groups are often seated ahead of single persons is that there are typically a lot more tables which seat four people than any other type. Couples are often seated at 4-person tables, as are groups of 3 and 4, but seating a single person at one during a busy period (as noted) means even more lost revenue per spot. So restaurants usually wait till one of the smaller tables comes available.

Queertypie November 28, 2009 at 3:38 pm

The best experience I had while traveling was this past October. We had gone to Seattle to celebrate our anniversary. My girlfriend and I mentioned this to the person that checked us in at the Warwick when she asked why we had come. She upgraded our room, and we got a drinks credit for their bar and restaurant. It was the first time she and I had gotten that sort of treatment, despite taking an anniversary trip every year. It was very touching, and I will always return to the Warwick when I go to Seattle. We also had a very positive experience at Disneyland, they gave us buttons at the shop when we told them why we were visiting, and ride operators, shopkeepers, and servers all day commented on it, and how nice it was, without any judgement and only congratulations. Those things make the trip for us.

There are a lot of places I would like to go, but may be less likely to because I’m not very good at being closeted. Wyoming, Missouri, Georgia, Kentucky, those are all pretty much out for me. All I really need is to be able to kiss my girl in public like a million straight people do.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: