Too good to be true? 4 times you should just say ‘no’ to a deal

by Christopher Elliott on April 28, 2010


If you found a bargain airfare, you’d book it, right?

But what if you knew the price was a mistake? Would you still do it?

In an era of too-good-to-be-true prices, gimmicky discounts and even an occasional zero fare, travelers have to make that call every day.

Sometimes they get it right. Sometimes not.

Last fall, for example, British Airways accidentally offered a $40 base fare from North America to India. After taxes and fees were added, the total came to around $500 — still a deal, but not an obvious error to the untrained eye. Thousands of people booked tickets in a two-hour period.

When British Airways refused to honor the price, many inexperienced air travelers were outraged. They pointed out that if the tables were turned — if they had made a mistake on their ticket — that the airline would keep their money.

But a smaller subset of travelers spotted the $40 base fares and knew they were a mistake, but booked anyway, believing they could force British Airways to accept the purchase. Was that wrong?

William Sannwald, a lecturer at San Diego State University, says both a company and its customers have an obligation to determine if an offer is accurate. “With all the unethical things taking place in business today,” he says, “I think that customers need to be vigilant in any transaction.” And flexible, too. “We all make mistakes, and a reasonable person should understand this,” he added.

I’ve been thinking about what separates a frugal traveler from a thief, and although the experts I spoke to seem to agree on the big issues (you know, stealing is wrong) there’s no unanimity when it comes to finer points of pricing snafus. By way of full disclosure, I thought the travelers who bought tickets knowing the fare was foul were morally challenged. In a blog comment, I referred to them as “bottom feeders,” which may have been a little harsh. I probably just should have called them criminals.

When do you say “no” to a deal?

When it’s too good to be true
Everyone knows when something just doesn’t feel right. And if you’ve been around long enough, you also know when it probably isn’t — either there’s a catch or it’s a bait-and-switch or it’s a legitimate error.

“If it appears to be too good to be true,” says Charles Green, the chief executive of Trusted Advisor Associates, a business consulting firm in West Orange, N.J., “then it’s very possibly not true.” The gut-check is important. It can save you from making a small mistake, like buying an erroneous fare, to investing in a fraudulent travel club or timeshare.

If you know it’s a mistake
Virtually all of the experts I spoke with for this story told me that knowingly booking an erroneous fare is wrong. The argument that airlines wouldn’t be as understanding if the roles were reversed made no difference to them.

But what if you don’t know? Jonathan Burgstone, an adjunct professor at the University of California’s Center for Entrepreneurship & Technology, says that’s different. “If the customer is genuinely unaware of the mistake, then he or she could reasonably accept the transaction,” he says. “A reasonable-minded person can generally assume that an advertised price is correct.” (British Airways offered a $300 voucher off a future flight, incidentally.)

If the company is wishy-washy
Obviously, having to wade through pages of fine print on a “bargain” can be such a turn-off that you would want to walk away. But if you see a terrific offer and make inquiries, and the answers are less than satisfactory, perhaps you shouldn’t be making reservations.

“Check with the airline or with a travel agent,” advises Joseph Pastore, a professor at Pace University’s business school. Only if you have a clear and satisfactory answer should you assume the offer is legit. (In the British Airways case, travelers were initially told the offer was good, but it was over a weekend, when key decision-makers weren’t available).

If it’s a dramatically lower price than anyone else is offering
Ever heard of the saying, “You get what you pay for”? When it comes to pricing errors, that may be particularly true. A price that’s far lower than those of competitors can be assumed to be either wrong or defective (or both).

“To manage your risk, you might buy another reasonable fare,” says Rick Brenner, a consultant with the management consulting firm Chaco Canyon Consulting in Cambridge, Mass. If you want to hedge your bets, and are planning hotel reservations, consider booking a more expensive, refundable ticket — just in case. “When the offerer discovers its error, take the compensation and consider it your winnings,” he says. “This won’t always work, but I do believe it’s your best shot.”

I put the question to the ethicists: How should a British Airways scenario — or one like it — have played itself out? “The ethical thing to do is to flag the error,” says Shel Horowitz, an expert on marketing ethics.

“Good common sense should prevail” after that, says Mark Zupan, dean of University of Rochester’s business school. Which is to say that if an airline sells thousands of fares at $40, or even $500, it could present a financial hardship.

“Mistakes like this do get made and bearing the consequences of one’s mistakes is part of the process which one takes to pay better attention in the future,” he told me. “Where a firm’s ongoing viability is threatened by a mistake however, then it’s best for the company to fess up and find a way to make amends.” Zupan says the $300 offer was acceptable, given the circumstance.

On the question of whether a travel company should honor an incorrect price, there was some agreement among the professionals. Michael McGrath, author of the book “Decide Better! For a Better Life,” says a pricing error shouldn’t put a company out of business. “Decisions like this need to be made with consideration of what is ethical and what is a good customer practice, offset by the financial impact,” he told me.

But there’s a significant disconnect between the rhetoric and the reality. I asked Stephen Martin, a professor at the University of Denver’s business school, to poll his students about what they would have done if offered an erroneous fare. Although 90 percent believed buying an erroneous fare was unethical, a majority said they’d do it anyway.

“They felt like the airlines always take advantage of them,” Martin says.

At the same time, an equal percentage said they believed British Airways had missed an opportunity to make things right with its customers. “Most felt that $300 credit was a weak response and only intended to get more revenue,” he added.

In other words, we can talk about ethics until the cows come home. But once we’re on a plane, many of us jettison our values right out the cabin door.

(Photo: caribb/Flickr Creative Commons)

Print Friendly

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Too good to be true? 4 times you should just say ‘no’ to a deal -- Topsy.com

  • Onetraveler

    About this comment:
    ““To manage your risk, you might buy another reasonable fare,” says Rick Brenner, a consultant with the management consulting firm Chaco Canyon Consulting in Cambridge, Mass. If you want to hedge your bets, and are planning hotel reservations, consider booking a more expensive, refundable ticket — just in case. “When the offerer discovers its error, take the compensation and consider it your winnings,” he says. “This won’t always work, but I do believe it’s your best shot.””

    Brenner is suggesting yet another unethical action.. When you think about it, this double-purchase is an attempt to rig the system. Refundable tickets are meant to give a traveler flexibility in their travel schedules. To buy a ticket with the full intent of having it refunded just to beat the system as a hedge against your gimmick smacks of hucksterism and when you think about it, is also unfair to the airline.

    Just a quick observation about the human physche. How quick we are to lower our ethical rules that guide us when we are dealing with perceived big company, agency etc

    Isn’t it interesting how we as humans make value judgements in every action we take?

    Don’t get me wrong, I am not personally a saint by any means, I just find this a fascinating commentary on the human condition.

    Let’s change the story slightly and say there are two people looking for a job.

    Being in a position to hire only one, you decide that one person is a better value since she will work for less money per hour, but she has a child, so you are concerned about her reliability. On the other hand, the other person is asking for more per hour, but you feel he might be more reliable. Since you don’t know, you hire both with the full intent of firing one or the other in one month after you work with both and decide which one will be more reliable.

    Does this seem right.?

    Interesting. Isn’t it.

  • Bodega

    Making two reservations on the same flight can get both reservations cancelled. I noticed your experts didn’t mention this.

    Looking on line and then suggesting calling a travel agency to verify the fare is exactly why many agencies now charge an upfront fee to handle such research.

    Errors happen but the airlines shouldn’t be allowed to play both sides of the coin. Last year Spirit Airlines had a fare for under $20 from Florida to Central America, plus the taxes. Why should the consumer have to worry about the legitimacy of a price when carriers do offer ridiculousy low fares?

  • Hapgood

    The elephant in this room is that the game airlines play with “legitimate” fares is so loaded with gimmicks that it’s often difficult to distinguish between an error and the usual bait-and-switch. The current vogue for advertising a deceptively low fare for “competitive reasons,” and then playing a shell game with fees only after the customer has taken the bait, makes a $40 fare to India is entirely plausible. Especially if the actual hidden bottom line is $460 higher.

    The deceptiveness of “unbundling” has completely eliminated any arguments about “morality.” In this business, there is no morality. Greed and deception are the only rules– but that’s allowed only for the airlines. If the passenger is greedy and takes advantage of of an airline mistake, the airline is allowed to mount the high horse and force the passenger to pay for “cheating.” The airline makes whatever rules it wants and enforces them as they see fit. But somehow the passenger always has a “moral” obligation to to fully comply with whatever the airline dictates, even if it’s intentionally hidden or negligently “interpreted.”

    The only way to bring “morality” back into the airline industry is through regulation by Big Bad Government. As we’re now seeing, the Deregulated Free Market is encouraging airlines to advertise deceptively low fares, and then supplement them with as many “unbundled” (and unadvertised) fees as they can dream up. The Evil Socialist Government is the only entity that can put an end to these sneaky games by requiring transparency and truth in advertising.

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    “In the British Airways case, travelers were initially told the offer was good, but it was over a weekend, when key decision-makers weren’t available)” This doesn’t speak so well about the management of BA that they can’t ‘operate’ on weekends when the key decision-makers are not there. Someone couldn’t call them? The decision-makers don’t have Blackberries that they could receive a phone call or receive an e-mail?

    In the US, if a retailer put the wrong price sticker on an item, put the wrong price placard in front of an item, put the price tag in front of a display, etc., they are obligated to honor the price.

    In Arizona, if you are overcharged for an item at a local grocery chain, they will give you the item for free (if you have more than one item, the first item is only free).

    Giving the ‘crazy’ pricing structure of the airlines today, how could a passenger knew if the fare was incorrect given that there are airlines with $ 10 fares with a long list of fees and taxes?

    In regards to British Airways (BA), they should honor the pricing error. Maybe they should change their processes by adding another level of checking (eyes, software or both) on their fares before posting them on their website to reduce or eliminate that these pricing errors in the future. If BA overcharged their passengers with an incorrect error, will they give back the money to their customers? I doubt it.

    A few years ago, I had a sales rep that didn’t follow our company processes when pricing a system. He generated a price proposal which he left out several items resulting in a price for a system that was 50% lower than the actual price ($ 50,000 instead of $ 100,000). We honored the incorrect price, made no profits on the project and addressed the issue with the sales rep. We are a publicly-traded company so our integrity is important to us.

    BA won’t have gone out of business due to this pricing error. BA would have gain favorable goodwill if they honor the pricing error. Instead, BA elected another route of if we made a pricing mistake which we undercharge you, we are not going to honor it but if we overcharge you, we won’t give back your money. If it is okay for BA not to honor a pricing mistake, how about BA waiving the fee to change a reservation if a passenger made a mistake in the booking of their reservation?

    If the price of an airfare was $ 100 from “I have never head of this airline before” then I think you must question the fare. However, if the fare for a flight or the rate for a hotel room came from a major player such as British Airways, United, US Airways, Hilton, Marriott, etc, I think that most people won’t question the fare or room rate of being incorrect but a special or marketing promotion.

    A retail stores that has a flyer or ad in the Sunday edition of the local newspaper will generally have a disclosure such as “Not responsible for typographical errors” (Fry’s Electronics); “Not responsible for printing and typographical errors” (Office Max); “Best Buy is not responsible for typographical or pricing errors in this ad” (Best Buy).

    If it was a typographical error, stores won’t honor the price. Typically, when there is a typographical error, the store will put something by the product stating that the ad had a typographical error. However, if you went into a store and the item had a price sticker of $50 or there is a price tag on the shelf for $ 50 or placard with the price $ 50 in front of a display, the store is going to honor that price or be in violation of the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act (There is a federal DTPA that covers all 50 states and there are state DTPAs where some states have added more regulations to the federal DTPA).

    When I was in college, I remember reading a case where an automobile dealership was running radio ads (this was in the 70s) stating that you can buy a brand new car for 10,000 bananas. A person came to the dealership with 10,000 bananas. The case went to court and the customer won.

    In regards to British Airways (or other travel providers), they do not have a disclosure on their website stating that they are not responsible for typographical errors in fares. If they had that disclosure on their website then I will support BA in their decision of not honoring the fare error.

    One could agrue that this could be ‘bait & switch’…airlines could put low fares on their websites to get business then turn around to say that the fare was an error and for some additional money, we can give you a seat on the flight. Airlines will become like car dealerships that used to advertised a car for $ 15,000 but the car was gone when a customer arrived at the dealership before they were regulated to disclose how cars on their lot at this price and etc.

    I could be wrong but if I remember right, BA didn’t want to give full ‘cash’ refunds back to the customer…they wanted to give them credit vouchers for future flights if they elected not to paid additional money for their flights.

  • Robert

    We sold one of the $40.00 fares to India. We could have called BA to ask them but the same fares were in their system as well. We sold the ticket on a Friday – the passenger left on Sunday before BA renegged on the tickets that had been issued.

    We suspected that the fares were filed in error because of the fare basis involved. Normally severely discounted fares are sold from discount buckets in airline reservations systems. In this case the $40.00 fare was a Y fare that a walk up passenger would have paid. That was the red flag on the error. There is no way that it could have been correct. We could not wait for BA to correct the error because our customer was leaving on Sunday so we sold the ticket. We advised the client that fare was most likely a mistake and BA might ask him to pay an additional amount which he was prepared to do but they allowed him to fly on the fare.

    Our dilemna was this – do we sell the incorrect fare which had no restrictions or do we sell him a non-refundable fare with penalties for changes? We sold the unrestricted fare.

    When I make an error and sell a ticket with a typo in the name field they have no hesitation forcing us to pay to make a correction. If I forget to enter the correct code for a child they charge us for the difference in the fare between a child and an adult, not the passenger.

    I consider myself a scrupulously ethical person and I have no regrets selling this ticket under these circumstances. They made an error and they suffer the consequences. By the way – we never received a debit memo asking us to pay an additional amount.

  • MVFlyer

    In some industries, there’s the concept of CAPA–corrective and preventive action. Corrective action in this case–admit your mistake and suffer the consequences (honor the fare). Preventive action–change your pricing software to include some sort of approval, error trap, or other secondary action before releasing the fare to the public. Instead of blaming this solely on some overworked programmer in BA’s headquarters, BA needs to take some of the responsibility, and their extremely expensive computer systems can be programmed to make a decision if a fare is reasonable or not.

  • John M

    In March 2009, Icelandic Air had a $68.00 round trip fare, plus taxes, fees, etc., from NYC to London. Delta, United and US Airways all had fares for $84 or $89 round trip, plus taxes and fees. How is the consumer to know if this is legit or not?

    To say if it seems to be too good to be true, it probably is, is easy to say but given the deals offered, it’s hard to say what is too good to be true anymore.

Previous post:

Next post: