Snakes on a plane, the sequel: Airlines turn to pets as a revenue source

by Janice Hough on June 22, 2009

Well, snakes might be a bit of a stretch, but you never know. As cash-strapped airlines seek new ways of making money from passengers, two airlines having turned to enticing people to travel with the family pet.

Air Canada will once again start allowing passengers to bring a small dog, or cat in the cabin starting July 1, 2009. The pet must weigh under 10 kilograms. The charge will be an additional $50 on flights within North America, or $100 for other international flights. Air Canada will allow a maximum of two to four pets on a flight, and they claim they will try to seat passengers with allergies away from the animals. (I am sure gate agents and flight attendants will love this additional job.)

And Southwest Airlines is allowing pets for the first time, for a flat $75 one-way charge. The airline is also stating only small dogs and cats will be allowed, and will allow up to five animals per flight. The airline is not planning any particular seating rules or designated areas for passengers with pets, except saying that they cannot be seated in exit rows.

While both airlines are saying that their new policies were made with pet owners in mind, it seems pretty clear that the policies were also made with their bottom lines in mind. This is pure extra revenue for airlines, and in fact, on some discounted flights the pet may pay more than a child.

Also, a small pet carrier takes up less room than many carry-on bags, and in fact, because an animal must be put under the seat in front of its owner, the dog or cat in question doesn’t even add to the overcrowding in the overhead compartment.

Actually, my guess would be that more people bringing pets might reduce crowding in the overhead bins, because carrying a pet reduces your ability to also carry a large carry-on bag.

As to potential snakes, while that idea might be somewhat tongue-in-cheek, there are people who own pet snakes, lizards, rabbits, guinea pigs, etc. And with the airlines looking for any potential revenue opportunities, it seems like a reasonable chance that at some point some airline will decide for $50 to $100 each way they can expand the definition of pet.

Print Friendly

  • Pingback: pligg.com

  • Allison

    The thoughts of having pets on planes really makes me cringe. With apologies to all those animal lovers out there, I am NOT one of you and choose not to have pets or be around other people’s. While some pets may be well behaved, the anxiety of the travel and being out of familiar circumstances may make some otherwise “happy” animals apprehensive, causing noise and/or unanticipated “potty” episodes in the cabin. (I just returned from a cross-country flight with a crying child, which was enough to make me want to tear my hair out.) And the possibility always exists that reptiles will be added to the mix; if that happens, I can assure the airlines there is not a chance in &*#% I’ll ever be getting on another plane. This practice is extremely inconsiderate of other travelers.

  • http://Tripsco Albert Bruton

    I don’t think I would like to have a dog or cat tucked under my seat, (“the caged animal must fit under the seat in front of you”),. The animal will need to urinate and have it’s bowel movements, especially on long haul flights.

  • Frank

    On June 22nd, 2009 at 8:52 am Allison said The thoughts of having pets on planes really makes me cringe. With apologies to all those animal lovers out there, I am NOT one of you and choose not to have pets or be around other people’s.
    ============================================================

    I agree with Allison. KEEP THEM AT HOME. Anyone remember the Whippet dog that was lost at JFK several years ago? NEVER FOUND.

    Here’s another one: http://www.helpfindjeddah.com/

    heart breaking!!!!!!!

    Lets not forget the article online where a passenger found a TICK onboard a flight. Now how unhealthy is that!!!!!!!!!

    There ya go: http://www.areawidenews.com/story/1445637.html

  • Holly

    I realize I am the exception and not the rule, but I travel with my dog. In fact, I moved to Argentina in March with him in tow. In my experience with both domestic flying and the long-haul, we’ve never had a “potty incident” nor a peep out of him. That’s more than I can say for some of the rotten, ill-behaved brats that I’ve encountered [adults and children]. Most of the time, flight attendants don’t notice, and my fellow passengers don’t even know he’s there. If he were poorly behaved or nervous, of course, I wouldn’t be able to travel in this manner, but luckily my pet is well-adjusted. I’d argue that you’ve flown with more pets than you’ve known about.
    As for the tick argument, I’m sure there’s way worse floating around in the recirculated air aboard a plane. Just ask the hacking, spitting gentleman across the aisle or the snot-faced kid kicking my seat. I’d take a tick over the flu any day, thank you very much.

Previous post:

Next post: