“Significant human error” – thoughts on the Costa Concordia tragedy

by Janice Hough on January 17, 2012


If anyone hadn’t heard of Costa Cruises before this weekend, they sure do now. Although, as of Monday, the story has moved to the inside of the front sections of U.S. newspapers, the repercussions will reverberate through the cruise industry for months if not years and it is still front-and-center in Europe.

In Britain, where I spent the weekend. The ship’s grounding on rocks and subsequent semi-sinking is the subject of front page news and 24/7 television, even though, there were only 35 British nationals on board (23 passengers and 12 crew). Of course, the incident happened in Europe, and since the ship is so close to shore, it continues to be a riveting visual spectacle.

The situation is ongoing — at the time of writing this post the damaged ship is apparently in danger of sinking to the ocean floor — but here are some collected and somewhat random thoughts for now.

It’s certainly a horrible story, all the more so because the reports are increasingly indicating, as the Costa chairman said “significant human error.” Or, if some of the stories circulating in the tabloids are true, better known as “significant human stupidity.” A headline in the U.K. Daily Mail screamed, “Was the captain showing off?”

(For anyone interested in a LOT more on the story, the Daily Mail Online is continuing with very in-depth coverage.)

It does appear like the captain was deliberately steering the ship close to shore either to salute a friend or a headwaiter who had family ashore. Or maybe it was just the equivalent of a cocky pilot buzzing people on the ground. Whatever the reason, after the fact, the decision was certainly a mistake.

The captain has also not helped his own cause with the public by having been seen ashore before many of the rescued passengers. (The Concordia also ran into the dock in Palermo, Sicily, in 2008, albeit with no injuries, just damage to the bow.)

One question going forward, however, is how this might affect cruising in future. Over the years after airline crashes I’ve had plenty of people ask about the type of plane they are flying on, or tell me they don’t want to take commuter planes, or fly with a particular airline.

It’s probably too soon to see how many people might end up canceling. As awful as the experience might have been, so far the death total is limited to six, albeit with up to 29 people missing. Whereas over 30,000 people are killed every year driving in the U.S. alone.

Curiously enough, the biggest fear for traveling Americans, or at least the one that has received the most press coverage lately, seems to be the violence in Mexico. Even though few tourists have been affected, many ships have pulled out of the Mexican Riviera, and there are reports of many passengers just staying on board.

Ironically, one of the few ships still sailing the 7-day Mexico cruise, however, is the Carnival Splendor, a sister ship to the Concordia.

Safety issues will no doubt become a big part of the story. We were actually joking on our last cruise in December about how short the lifeboat drills have become, and passengers haven’t even needed to wear lifejackets. For whatever reason, the Concordia, which had just sailed a few hours earlier, wasn’t going to have their drill until the next day.

Although it’s questionable, since the ship started listing so quickly, if a drill would have helped, as the lifeboats became increasingly difficult to operate. (On one side they couldn’t be lowered because they would hit the side of the ship, and on the other they had to be dropped quickly before being overrun by water.)

And in a perverse way, I have to wonder if the hint of danger, especially since over 4,000 people did escape, might actually for some make the idea of a cruise more enticing. (Attempts to climb Everest actually increased after the publication of “Into Thin Air,” which dramatized the stories of many deaths.)

No doubt there will be future changes in cruise line policies, and we haven’t even gotten into the insurance issues. Costa will almost certainly give payouts to passengers, but there are plenty of other side stores that hasn’t received much coverage such as an electricial failure after the ship first hit the rocks rendered the keycards inoperable, so most passengers weren’t able to retrieve so much as their jewelry and other valuables.

In some ways as sad as it would be, I hope the whole disaster was a stupid bit of hubris, because at this point that’s the least likely thing to be repeated. As opposed to a major design flaw. But no doubt we will be hearing a lot more in the weeks and months to come.

Print Friendly

  • Anonymous

    “only 6 people died” so it’s ok with you. How very cavalier your statement is. I kept thinking how bad I’d feel if “only 1″ person I loved had died on that ship.

  • http://www.tripso.com/author/leocha Charlie Leocha

    I edited that section a bit. However, the statement is not meant to be cavalier. Sorry if you take it that way.
    Editor

  • Graham

    The Daily Mail, bless it, has become the UK equivalent of the National Enquirer in the US.   Treat with extreme caution, in my view.

  • Anonymous

    I’d rather treat the cruise lines with extreme caution, in my view

  • Anonymous

    Oh, and I hope the Italian courts give him the same treatment they gave Amanda Knox and her boyfriend 
    Raffaele Sollecito.

  • Rubinstj

    I have sailed with Costa and I was disgusted with the casual sloppy attitude of the officers(people really running the ship and mostly Italian). Everything from Lifeboat drill to dining service to entertainment was  done in a sloppy way. Carnival cruise lines allow all the various brands to run in their own styles which may be good for marketing but poor for operations. I can’t see a Carnival, Princess or Holland American ship captain acting so carelessly.

  • Ton

    yes and no, the fact is that about 4000 people were on board and she went down quick (the titanic took way longer) so in a way you could say that given the short time the evacuation was a succes even if as it looks right now max 40 people died.

    The information that is becomming available looks worse than it is wordt like chaos and panic (who would not be in panic?) don’t always mean that it was don badly

    on the drill issue, experts have said that eventhough a drill is manditory within 24 hours, that is actually a bad idea, as people do not know the layout and are distracted by seeing new things ( 2 days after the drill people generaly do not know much about it anymore)

    What does scare me it that eventhough the damage was serious it went down so quickly, it it had happened in the atlantic, with colder water, bigger waves or at night, that would have been deadly

  • DCTA

    Ton – It did happen at night, in very cold water.

    Costa has a years long history of maritime accidents and there have been passengers who have been killed before (3 or 4 at Sharm el Sheikh).  I don’t sell that brand – EVER.

    It seems to me that the Italians run their cruise lines in a similar fashion as to how they run their trains!

  • Janice

    Interesting point, thanks for commenting.

  • Janice

    Actually the  Times, Independent and others aren’t far behind this time…. not to mention European CNN.  But thanks for the comment.

  • Frank

    A safety demonstration AFTER you’ ve already set sail?  Insane!  Seconds can save your life on an airplane, this incident proves that same on ships.  Not sure who governs these issues internationally on ships, but safety improvements are needed on the oceans, apparently. 

  • Lindajoyce2

    I cannot believe anyone would ever think of the “pervese” pleasure others might seek from the danger element!!! I am incensed at that statement…am I the only one???

  • Matthew in NYC

    What I expect to see going forward is Carnival Corporation sending internal auditors around the entire fleet to review ships’ logs and to require safety related explanations for any course deviations, backed up by Coast Guard and weather reports.

  • janice

    Linda. Most people don’t react that way.  Without naming names I can tell you I have had more than a few clients over the year who feel that way.  Has happened with ski avalanches, diving and climbing accidents, etc, etc.  People can be weird.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001840108686 Kevin La Van

    Totally agree. I blame CCL Corp for this – over building ships without having a pipeline of Captains able to handle ships like this. This is not the first problem this “captain” has had and why was he not removed.

  • DCTA

    There are a lot of people who are attracted to “extreme” travel.  they like the thrill of a little danger.  I have several clients like that.

  • DCTA

    I’m not certain he’s the same captain from that earlier Concordia accident.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001840108686 Kevin La Van

    It was reported that he did the same sort of thing be fore and left a port against Costa Policy and against the Cost Guards suggestion in France….may not be true but it was in a two papers (one in italy and in UK).

Previous post:

Next post: