Is it time for the government to get serious about passenger rail?

by Charlie Leocha on January 15, 2009

There has been a lot of talk about an infrastructure stimulus program in the United States, but only in the most general of terms. Even the ideas flying around the Internet, leaked from Democrat think tanks and inside the beltway, are sketchy. Highway and bridge construction are certainly on the fast track and perhaps air traffic control and airport infrastructure as well. But what about rail and mass transit?

In Europe, a focused government effort to improve rail transport has resulted in new competition to the airlines in Germany, France, Italy and Spain. The Chunnel’s Eurostar train has been carrying record numbers of passengers.

These passenger increases are not because of bargain basement prices. Trains end up costing about the same as planes or more in some cases. However, the service is from city-center to city-center with stops at plenty of interim villages and towns. Trains can be far more convenient and a real time-saver when time getting to the airport, checking in and waiting at the gate are factored into the time equation.

Trains also become part of the local commuting fabric of countries where rail infrastructure has been a priority. Can anyone imagine the traffic in New York City, Chicago, London or Paris without their subway systems. Even in Washington, the metro takes commuters off the overloaded suburban highways. Every recent case of improvement in local and regional rail transportation has resulted in dramatically higher passenger loads than predicted.

It may be time for the government to get serious about passenger rail and make it a real part of new infrastructure projects. But, let’s not get carried away. How about focusing on the tried and true rather than sending hundreds of millions on pie-in-the-sky projects like maglev trains. That is the proper province of private investors.

The biggest focus should be on improved right-of-way for passenger rail tracks, widening that right of way and improving current tracks and rail cars. A legitimate rail system between Washington, Baltimore, Philadelphia, New York and Boston would be a good start.

Print Friendly

  • Don J

    The governors of Wisconsin and Minnesota have put a high speed rail (definitely not mag lev or bullet train) connection from Chicago to Minneapolis as their #1 priority for any federal Recovery Act funds. There has long been great passenger rail service between Milwaukee and Chicago. The preliminary studies, etc., have been completed for the longer run, including issues regarding right of way and grade crossings. It is as close to “shovel ready” as any rail project in the nation. Thanks for the good analysis.

  • Ton

    As a european i have seen the results of these investments and frankly not impressed

    Huge costs (the channel tunnel wil never make what it has cost to build) and most services are in the hands of old style monopolies which generate business by killing of alternatives.

    And as an alternative it fails

    i recently did a check from my hometown (rotterdam) to london

    I could use a local airport and a premium airline to fly to london city airport, the costs are about 190 euro’s, both airports are small, require you to be there about 30min to an hour time for departure and are close to the city center.

    a low cost carrier from the same airport but to london luton is about 110 euro (plus 20 for train to london) takes a bit more time but saves some money

    the train will take me to london from the city center, 1 connection in brussels, traveltime about 6 hours to the same trainstation in londen as the low cost solution. Price about 120 euros

    so i lose about 4 hours both way, but here is the kicker if i want i fly as early as 0700 (and due to time difference be there at 0700) and fly back at 2100 (arrive at 2300) but if a want to stretch my day in londen a bit by picking a later train the train people will charge me 270 euros, more that 2x the price of the cheapest ticket (both are 2nd class prices btw)

    so i will take the plane, because it gives me time to have lunch and an early diner in london, have meetings even shop a little and have time left over.

    the airlines have been in cutthroat competion for years, the railroads have not
    it is that simple

  • marge

    “Is it time for the government to get serious about passenger rail?”

    You betcha! I am on the steering committee for the Quad Cities Passenger Rail Coalition: http://qcrail.com/

    We have spent countless hours & resources to make this happen. We won’t give up!

Previous post:

Next post: