Oops, we lost your kids — Delta sends children to wrong airports

by Janice Hough on June 10, 2010


Paying baggage fees when the airline loses your baggage is galling. But pay hefty fees to have an airline take care of your children and them finding them flying to another city, hundreds of miles away, is enough to make the hair on the back of any parent’s neck stand straight up.

Along with everything else, airline unaccompanied minor fees have been steadily increasing. For most parents it’s a small price to pay for the peace of mind of having their children looked after while traveling alone, especially when a connecting flight is involved.

Unfortunately, earlier this week that’s not the way it turned out for two families who paid the $100 fee and sent their children on their flight on Delta.

The children made their connections in Minneapolis, but somehow they got swapped to the wrong airports. The Boston kid ended up in Cleveland and the Cleveland kid ended up in Boston.

As reported by WOIO television in Cleveland, an airline spokesman said that they were “inadvertently boarded on incorrect connecting flights as a result of a paperwork swap.”

Delta Airlines did say, however, that they “apologized to the families, re-accommodated the children to their final destination cities at no cost, arranged full refunds for the children’s tickets, provided credits to the families for future travel, and refunded their unaccompanied minor fees.”

I particularly like the fact that they refunded the unaccompanied minor fee and didn’t charge the families to get the children to their final destination. Wonder if they charged the children for onboard meals?

In this case, it sounds like no permanent harm was done, and now two kids have great topics for their “what I did on my summer vacation” essays. But in all seriousness, however, this does bring up a tip or two for parents sending their children on flights alone.

1. Tell your child to speak up if anything seems wrong. Presumably the children did hear the destination announcements for their cities when they were put on the wrong plane.

It’s possible they were confused, but often children are afraid to risk confrontation with adults, even relatively non-threatening adults such as flight attendants.

In fact, this advice applies to other travel situations as well, if another passenger is making a child uncomfortable, or the child is not feeling well, or there is some other problem, within reason it’s a good idea to talk to a flight attendant or gate agent.

Or if talking to an airline employee doesn’t seem to be an option, and your child has a cellphone, suggest that they use it and call you. There were no details on when the children realized the mix-up, but it probably was before Delta did.

2. Another tip wouldn’t have helped in this case, but would have several years ago for a co-worker’s son. If there is a connecting flight, not only should you make sure your child knows what city they are traveling to, but remind them to be careful about wandering away from the gate.

A flight attendant had actually delivered this boy to the right gate, but then left. The child got bored and went to look in some stores. The aircraft departed and got as far as the runway line without him. Fortunately, when he returned to the gate, an agent was able to bring the plane back.

In this week’s incident, besides compensating the families, Delta has apologized, and one would hope that whatever loophole prompted the mistake has been closed.

Although considering that a little over a decade ago Delta pilots landed at Frankfort, Kentucky instead of Lexington, and last year overflew an airport completely, perhaps the airline should be a little more focused on details.

Photo: Ciao Bambino

Print Friendly

  • laura townsend elion

    Duck tape a label to your child’s clothing – “I’m going to Cleveland” or whatever. Much like the patients that write on the body part that’s supposed to be operated on, this should be helpful to any staff the kid encounters. Even older children are often occupied with hand held devices, music earphones, books, etc., and may not hear directional announcements. Or, they may be so geographically challenged that when they hear the wrong destination, they simply think its another stop along the way.

  • Barry Richcreek

    Very easy solution to this problem. All any airline has to do is band the child the same way hospitals do when your admitted into a hospital. At the time the parent releases the child into the airline’s hands their banded in front of the parent. When the child goes to board the plane they scan the wrist band.

    Solves two problem 1) connection issues and 2) if security or airline staff notices a child wondering around an airport unaccompnied with that wrist band they get them back to there proper location.

  • dcta

    When the parent checks the child in, s/he he is given and forced to wear a clear pouch on some sort of cord around his/her neck – in the pouch is all the pertinent paperwork.

    FAs are supposed to read the paperwork, ask the kid’s name, etc., to be sure they are putting the right kid on the right plane….apparently these two FAs didn’t check the way they are supposed to.

  • SpaceCadet51

    Something you have failed to address here is that most likely the employees who swapped the kids were overworked and underpaid. Do any readers of these columns realize that airline employees at hubs such as MSP have to do all the work involved with bringing in aircraft, offloading, wheelchairs, loading baggage, stowing excess carryon baggage under the aircraft, required government and airline paperwork, passenger seat swaps and upgrades, not to mention keeping an eye out for people trying to sneak onto the plane when they are not ticketed for the flight in question AND parents who deliver unaccompanied minors to the gate LATE, knowing that there is still yet more paperwork to be done once they get there — and with a 25 minute turnaround time for a plane? Yep, you’ve got 25 minutes (or for a larger plane maybe 30) to take care of all this most likely by yourself? And for under $9 an hour, to boot. I don’t want to hear the usual, “Well, if you don’t like your job, leave!” Some of us do still enjoy doing this job regardless. We just want some help. The same thing happened with Continental/ExpressJet in Boston last year. There was one agent boarding two planes simultaneously and two kids got swapped. So what was the knee-jerk reaction? “We need more training.” Sorry, nope … we need one extra body at the gate to get all this work done. To those executives who holler that they can’t afford the extra pay and benefits another employee would mean … try comparing that to the cost of the inevitable lawsuits.

  • http://www.twitter.com/cestbeth Beth

    With regard to on-board meals (mentioned in the post), I don’t think there are any meals between MSP-BOS or MSP-CLE! The following is the official statement from Delta. Apparently there was a “paperwork swap” of some sort, which caused the error: “Two customers connecting through Minneapolis/St. Paul on June 8 as part of our unaccompanied minor program were inadvertently boarded on incorrect connecting flights as a result of a paperwork swap. The children were under airline supervision at all times. Upon learning of the situation, we immediately contacted their guardians to advise them that their children had been rerouted to their final destinations and were en route. We apologized to the families, re-accommodated the children to their final destination cities at no cost, arranged full refunds for the children’s tickets, provided credits to the families for future travel and refunded their unaccompanied minor fees. We sincerely apologize to the families involved for this mistake.”

  • Frank

    I believe some airlines DO NOT allow un-accompanied minors to make connections now, isnt that right, Mr CONSUMERTRAVELER?

  • Karen C.

    Here’s the follow-up story in the Boston Globe, which sort of indicates that the Delta employees were just not paying attention, not that there was a paperwork mix-up. Makes me think I’d never trust the airlines with an unaccompanied minor, which was sort of how I felt before this. http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2010/06/11/deltas_mix_up_raises_fears_for_grandfather/

  • Crystal C.

    I cant even imagine how those kids and parents are feeling. My son just flew to Texas on Delta from Georgia on 6/02/2010. When I went to check him in to get his boarding pass and my pass to walk him back everything was fine filled out paperwork and payed my $100. When we went to the check point the security called my sons name but it was the wrong name, so I corrected him. Then he showed me the boarding pass that I just got and it was someone else’s name and the destination was to LA. So we had to go back to correct it, but the thought of my 10 year old son going to another city with no one there to get him really freaked me out. I lost it!!! I called and complained and they reimburse us our $100 but still we as parents only want the safety of our kids when we cant do it for them. What is Delta going to do now that this is happening to often?

  • pat

    Its your kid, your responsibility to take vacation a day off or whatever to get your responsibility (Kid) or elderly parent to the part of the world or state that they need or want to be in.. not the airlines for a hundred bucks. That is what is wrong with this world, no one wants to take responsibility but put the blame on someone else. Yes, the airlne lost the kid, but he should have been with his parent or legal guafdian anyway..

  • http://estern6956@aol.com barbara

    Pat, you said it perfectly. Parents it is your responsibility not the airline. I feel sorry for the overworked flight attendants who without a doubt probably recieved hell, or worse may have lost their jobs.

  • Jeff

    “relatively non-threatening adults such as flight attendants” – Not on my recent flights! For that matter, even I’m afraid to say anything to a flight attendant other than “hello”, “club soda, please”, and “thank you” for fear of being arrested for looking at them wrong. I understand they have to put up with a lot, from their own employers as well as some rowdy passengers, but too many flight attendants I’ve observed lately seem to enjoy wielding the “you must comply with all instructions from all crew members” phrase like a weapon. That’s the implied threat.

    Then there are the explicit threats: During a recent weather induced diversion from Atlanta to Birmingham, we were stuck on the tarmac for 3 hour, with the expectation early into the incident that the delay could be MUCH longer. After about 90 minutes, the captain taxied to a gate. One of the flight attendants then squawked the P.A. with the following Kafkaesque announcement: “We can’t stop you from deplaning, but if you leave the aircraft, you will NOT be allowed to re-board, and will be responsible for your own transportation from Birmingham to your final destination”. This was repeated several times by a flight attendant who didn’t even have the decency to conceal her delight; these announcements provided the only evidence that this individual was capable of forming a smile. Apparently, that was the strategy to get around the new regulation requiring airlines to let passengers off the aircraft in extended delays. Small wonder that Delta is # 1 in complaints to the DoT.

    Look, I know that it takes time to allow passengers off and then re-board, but even the captain admitted that he had no idea how long we would be stuck there. Since our connecting flights were long gone anyway, would it really hurt to let those passengers who wanted to go ahead and stretch their legs, use a real restroom, and get some hot food? Is it true that pay stops for air crews when the door is opened? I’m asking sincerely, not rhetorically. If that’s true, could it really be that passengers would essentially be held hostage to keep the air crew from being docked an hour or so? (Now THAT was rhetorical.)

    For those kind, polite, and helpful flight attendants reading: the preceding comments not directed at you. Even though your numbers are rapidly dwindling, and too few of your colleagues follow your example, don’t lose your sense of decency; I hope to meet you at 30,000 feet.

  • Henry

    pat got it exactly right. i think the airlines are wrong to accept unaccompanied minor passengeres, and parents are wrong for sending their children onto aircraft unsupervised.

  • Frank

    JEFF:
    Look, I know that it takes time to allow passengers off and then re-board, but even the captain admitted that he had no idea how long we would be stuck there. Since our connecting flights were long gone anyway, would it really hurt to let those passengers who wanted to go ahead and stretch their legs, use a real restroom, and get some hot food? Is it true that pay stops for air crews when the door is opened? I’m asking sincerely, not rhetorically. If that’s true, could it really be that passengers would essentially be held hostage to keep the air crew from being docked an hour or so? (Now THAT was rhetorical.)
    ===============================================

    Jeff, it has NOTHING TO DO WITH PAY. It has everything to do with security. You let 20 passengers off the aircraft and do a headcount and three are missing. What do you do? Page them several times……hoping they return ASAP. Did they have carry on bags onboard, are those bags still onboard? What about checked bags? Should the Capt decide to pull them? Now, you have an aircraft ready to leave, but you have missing passengers. That’s a security issue, NOT a pay issue!

  • Frank

    pat June 11, 2010 at 12:21 pm
    Its your kid, your responsibility to take vacation a day off or whatever to get your responsibility (Kid) or elderly parent to the part of the world or state that they need or want to be in.. not the airlines for a hundred bucks. That is what is wrong with this world, no one wants to take responsibility but put the blame on someone else. Yes, the airlne lost the kid, but he should have been with his parent or legal guafdian anyway..

    barbara June 11, 2010 at 2:55 pm
    Pat, you said it perfectly. Parents it is your responsibility not the airline. I feel sorry for the overworked flight attendants who without a doubt probably recieved hell, or worse may have lost their jobs.
    ===================================================

    It’s heartbreaking to see the amount of kids that are SHUFFLED between parents when school lets out for the summer months. I’ve seen kids hysterically crying, not wanting to go to their destination. I’ve seen kids cry as the plane pushes back, they realize at the point they’re alone. MOST kids have no money to purchase inflight snacks or food. And, MOST are hungry. I feel for all these parents. Many purchase expensive electronic devices for these kids, probably out of guilt, so they have something to use inflight. I once had a small child who didnt know how to use the utensils for his meal. I moved the passenger next to him and helped him eat his meal. (someone wrote me a good letter for that). During delays, I’ve called the guardians to let them know what was going on.
    Parents, let your children know that they shouldnt leave the aircraft without supervision. You have 200 passengers on a flight, everyone is deplaning, and you (the flight attendant) prays that they heeded your rules. DO NOT remove stickers, lanyards, any device that shows your an un-accompanied MINOR. (alot do).
    I like the cellphone advice in this article. I rarely see them on U-M’s.

    What needs to be fixed here is that the overworked AGENT on the ground had several unacccompanied minors. PAPERWORK got mixed up, hence the kids also got mixed up. ARM BANDS with bag tag type NUMBERS to match paperwork NUMBERS would solve that problem.
    During this incident, someone could of simply said some names to verify identities.

  • Hawaiian Gal

    I’ve just sat and read all the above comments, and frankly I can’t believe that people are really this stupid. For Jeff, who writes “too many flight attendants I’ve observed lately seem to enjoy wielding the “you must comply with all instructions from all crew members” phrase like a weapon. That’s the implied threat”. You do realize that Flight Attendants are on planes for SAFETY, not for beverage and snack service. The crew is responsible to get all passengers to their destinations safely. If you don’t like having to comply with all the instructions, then DRIVE!!!!!

  • Mona

    When my 14-yo daughter flew alone from Dallas to San Francisco many years ago, she was very upset with me for declaring her an unaccompanied minor. Turns out I might as well not have bothered. No one told her to remain seated when they landed and a flight attendant would accompany her off the plane, so she got up and left by herself. Her aunt, who’s always notoriously late, was not there to meet the plane and my daughter, not knowing what else to do, found a pay phone and called me (before the days of a cell phone in every pocket). I reminded her of her aunt’s chronic tardiness and told her to just wait at the gate and call me back in 30 minutes or when her aunt got there, whichever came first. The aunt did arrive about 20 minutes later – that panic averted – BUT no one realized until that night that my daughter did not have her return ticket because I had handed it over to the flight attendant when she boarded. The uncle called the airlines and the ticket was tracked down, but they told him someone would have to come back to the airport to pick it up – until he reminded them that they had been negligent in letting an unaccompanied minor debark alone and, playing his trump card, identified himself as a lawyer. They suddenly decided it would be their pleasure to deliver the ticket to the house the next day!

  • http://www.desertjet.com Denise

    I caution parents about letting their children travel unaccompanied on an airliner. As a former airline employee, I’ve seen flight attendants lose track of minors. Really it shouldn’t be there responsibility anyway as crew members are there for safety reasons, not babysitting.

    If you must send your child on an aircraft without you or family supervision, the only safe way to travel is by private jet.

  • http://www.cockam.com ajaynejr

    For the unaccompanied minor fee:

    The crew can be expected to see to the child’s safety and comfort. The more cooperative other passengers are, the less intervention on the part of the crew would be necessary.

    The airline can be expected to re-accommodate the child on its next operating flight in the event of an irregularity where the booked flight does not operate.

  • http://www.cockam.com ajaynejr

    >>>> the only safe way to travel is by private jet

    On a commercial airliner the crew in exchange for the unaccompanied minor fee is responsible for the safety of the minor and his belongings, documents, electronics, baggage, etc.

  • Will

    Flight attendants, if you do not like the responsibilities that are imposed upon you by your job, then get a different job. I mean seriously, you are in fact being held responsible for a child. Let me say that again a child. I would imagine losing your job should be the last thing you should be worried about if you actually lost a child. Maybe, you should worry more about the childs parents grief!

  • Pingback: Oops we did it again. United misplaces a child in Chicago

Previous post:

Next post: