Minimum connecting time and other dreams

by Janice Hough on August 24, 2009

ohare

Someone once said that “Minimum Connecting Time” is the amount of time it takes an Olympic sprinter to get between gates with no luggage.

Whether or not you find that humorous may well depend if you have missed a flight lately. But increasingly, it does feel as if “Minimum Connecting Time” – aka MCT has really become a joke.

Technically, the term means the time a traveler needs to make a connection, with luggage, and it is dependent on a number of things, including the airline, the airport, whether or not it is a connection between the same airlines.

And as with many things, it is an inexact science.

It perhaps goes without saying that connecting times are based on able-bodied adults. Which means if you know you move slowly, or will be traveling with young children and/or babies, it’s a wise idea to allow a little extra time.

Ditto if you absolutely have to make that connecting flight, arriving earlier won’t hurt. And these days, there are so many airports with Wifi, you won’t even add much down time. Or you could actually do something old-fashioned and fun like reading a book. Or buy an alternative meal to the food sold on planes. (Only the airlines could make airport food routinely look good.)

Having said all that, some MCTs are flat out unrealistic. In Frankfurt, for example, where transit passengers go through passport control, the MCT is 45 minutes. I don’t have a single regular European client who feels comfortable there with less than an hour, preferably an hour and a half.

London, Heathrow, the airport so many love to hate, has a variety of times, and much depends on the terminal connections. Once an intra-terminal bus is involved, all bets are off. But the inter-airline MCTs routinely seem over optimistic.

Another international travel problem is Dulles, where repeatedly I have been told that the customs and immigration area is too small, and that clients have or have almost missed their connections to domestic flights.

Even for wholly U.S, travel, there are still plenty of potential pratfalls. Some are relatively simple airports, with ridiculous distances. As any United flier knows, the Denver concourse is great for a cardio-vascular workout, bad for a tight connection. Especially if you are connecting to or from United Express, which is now mostly housed in an auxiliary terminal, even further from the main gates.

Other airports, like Dallas, Chicago and Atlanta, are problematic because of their size. With airline consolidation and the number of gates for each carrier, the odds have gone up that even an online connection might involve changing concourses.

If you are changing between airlines, on the other hand, you almost always want to increase the suggested connecting time. One, because airlines often won’t hold the plane these days for an online connection, let alone for someone else’s flight. And in some airports, JFK and SFO for examples, you may have to exit and re-enter security.

Another especially problematic situation in many airports is transferring from a commuter plane to a larger plane. While MCTs are often the same despite plane size, they perhaps shouldn’t be, for at least three reasons:

First, smaller planes are more likely to be at outlying gates; second, because smaller planes tend to be delayed more often, especially in bad weather; third, because even if a carrier decides to hold a flight for some late-arriving passengers, a smaller plane will simply be less likely to have a number of people connecting to any given other flight. And thus, less reason to delay a second plane.

Finally, there’s the comfort factor. This could be true even if you have say, a 50-minute connection that is legitimate, and the planes are likely to be in the same zip code at the airport. If you are a nervous flier, and you will be sweating the connection in advance and on the day of flight, consider just taking a longer connection if available. As I have told some clients, it it’s going to ruin your day worrying even if you make it, make things easier on yourself and book a longer connection. It doesn’t guarantee a smooth travel day, or even that you will avoid a run through the airport, but odds are, it will be more relaxing.

And once upon a time, that was part of the point of air travel.

(Photo of O’Hare Airport Tunnel by Christopher Blizzard on Flickr)

Print Friendly

  • Bodega

    As those of us who book air travel for clients, know that the policy of married segments can be a nightmare for passengers. Legal connect times doesn’t mean reasonable connect times.

  • Graham Harrison

    If you are a “self-booker”, particularly via the web, it can be quite difficult to get the systems to give you a reasonable connection. The systems are all programmed to give you as near MCT as possible. That’s OK for those of us who know what to look for but for most people they just pick the cheapest and believe what the airlines tell them they can make in the way of connections.

  • jr

    Helloo, 3 years ago i did 40 min connections in frankfurt for about 7 trips from GRZ-FRA-IAD …
    not a problem if you know where to go … I had just carry ons….
    Just the first plain isn’t allowed to be late. Missed once…. plane was still there but was allready closed….

    JR

  • Joel Wechsler

    @Bodega you should explain what married segments are. Otherwise most people will not understand your point. Ny the way, I agree completely. It can definitely create nighgmares, especially when there is no later flight and he connection is missed. I would liem to think that the airlines who follow this policy are a little more likely to hold a flight but I have no evidence for that.

  • DaveS

    Some sites do give you lots of choices for connections on a given day’s flights. Kayak.com is an example – the screens offer many more options than the close connection.

    What is a reasonable connection time does depend on many factors. Just last year I was scheduled with a group of 10 people for a Minneapolis to Madrid flight with a seemingly hopeless connection time of 40 minutes in Amsterdam. I knew we’d miss the Madrid flight, but when we deplaned in Amsterdam, a perky KLM agent was there to meet us, and said, “I’m going to walk fast. Keep up with me!” and shepherded us through every step and pitfall of the airport. The Madrid flight was boarding as we reached the gate, and we did make the connection…….if only our luggage had been so fortunate!

  • brimdle

    Transfer times are not a good thing, when travelling by wheelchair,for a start, we told not to leave the plane until everybody is off This can take any from 15 min for a small plane, and upto 25 min on a jumbo,We are taken by airport staff, to the next aircraft,once the airline said 50 min for transfer, Is impossible.We try for 1.5-2hrs thats about right.

  • Jaime Navau Pons

    How time is necesaire for connecting :
    arrival: LH493 vancouver to franfkfurt 11’30 h.
    departure: LH4454 frankfurt to barcelona 13’10 h.
    thank you

  • http://www.tripso.com/author/leocha Charlie Leocha

    @Jaime Should be pleny of connecting time.

  • Jutarat

    Who make the rules of legal minimum connecting time? Is it the airlines/ airports/FAA? Where could I find the information? I’m doing the project about illegal connecting flight.

  • http://www.clarkecomputer.com Charles Clarke

    I like allowing for extra time for connections, but it helps to be aware that for domestic flights, if your connection is over 4 hours, it is considered a stopover and so you’ll probably pay more than you need to for that ticket. Of course, sometimes your choices are 45 minutes or 4 hours and 45 minutes. Time for a different connecting city or airline! :-)

Previous post:

Next post: