JetBlue’s “classy and professional” move for disabled passenger in need

by Christopher Elliott on March 8, 2010

Here’s a pick-me-up story for a Monday morning: Penny Parrish’s niece bought a roundtrip ticket to Florida to visit her ailing father late last year, but when he died and she asked to return home early, JetBlue Airways charged her a ticket change fee.

Parrish’s niece is deaf, so she suspects there may have been a communication problem at the airport. That’s when she discovered a rarely-used list of JetBlue contacts on my site.

I emailed JetBlue, based on names and addresses I found on your Web site. I focused on a customer support person and ADA [Americans with Disabilities Act].

In the end, they said that although they did not have any obligation to do so, they would credit the $169 back to the charge card. They also passed along sympathy to my niece.

It was classy and professional.

Given that discrimination is rampant in the travel industry — as I discussed in yesterday’s Navigator column — I agree that JetBlue’s actions are both classy and professional. I wish the ticket agents had taken the time to understand Parrish’s niece before asking her to pay a change fee, but in the end, the airline did the right thing.

This does, however, raise an interesting question: When should an airline waive its fees? Is a death in the family a good enough reason? How about financial hardship? Difficult personal circumstances?

I remember a time not so long ago when change fees were routinely waived, often just for the asking. Today, they’re a major revenue source for airlines. If the current trend holds for 2009, airlines will have made well over $2 billion from reservation and cancellation fees, according to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics.

Shouldn’t airlines be making their money the honest way — through ticket sales — as opposed to from “gotcha” ancillary fees, like those required when you change your ticket? I believe carriers like Southwest (and to an extent, JetBlue) have already answered that question.

What do you think?

(Photo: Drewski2112/Flickr Creative Commons)

Print Friendly

  • DCTA

    Just a short story about another travel vendor that showed good judgement in “similar” case.

    I was in Florida in 2002 at Thanksgiving visiting my very ill mother. Mom died on Wednesday (day before Thanksgiving) and I had originally expected to return home on Sunday but now needed to extend by three days to the following Wednesday. I had no problems with air ticket (was flying on a “reward” ticket for Travel Agents and AAL just simply changed it for me with n o charge given the circumstances) and called Avis to extend the rental car – they did so, now problem and I was expecting to pay for those three extra days when I turned the car in. Because a change had been made to the contract, I could not just drop the car and go, but had to go to a Counter Agent to settle everything up. She asked why I had extended the car, and when I told her she extended her condolences and then “comped” the three extra days. There was no reason to do that for me, but she did and I will never forget that – and I always rent Avis now.

    Some companies give their employees leeway to do this sort of thing and when they do have the ability, most of them will extend such courtesies. I suspect that in the JetBlue situation, if the agent who changed the ticket had understood what happened s/he would have waived the fare difference right then and there.

  • MVFlyer

    You’re right, Chris–this is the model that should be used, making money off of the primary product. But that’s not the way it works anymore, I guess. Notice when they charge you the most onerous of fees, the schedule change–when they’ve already gotten your money for the fare, and you’re powerless to do anything about it. To me, that’s the worst fee of all–and completely out of line with the amount of work it takes to accomplish the change. It amounts to a ‘bribe’ to entice the airline to make the change.

Previous post:

Next post: