<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Congress doing enough make cruise passengers safe?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/is-congress-doing-enough-make-cruise-passengers-safe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/is-congress-doing-enough-make-cruise-passengers-safe/</link>
	<description>The last honest travel site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/is-congress-doing-enough-make-cruise-passengers-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-30138</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=5044#comment-30138</guid>
		<description>Marge, would you feel the same if your daughter was just assaulted and raped by a cruise-line employee who had no background check done because congress &quot;has, or should have, more pressing issues&quot;.  No one reported it because they were not required to.  The evidence was taken by the cruise ship employees and destroyed because the cruise lawyers instructed this and they do everything in their power to make it look as if it was your daughter&#039;s own fault that she was violently assaulted and raped?   Ah, ok, I see your point... not that &quot;pressing&quot; of an issue to make cruising safer.  Ok.  gotcha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marge, would you feel the same if your daughter was just assaulted and raped by a cruise-line employee who had no background check done because congress &#8220;has, or should have, more pressing issues&#8221;.  No one reported it because they were not required to.  The evidence was taken by the cruise ship employees and destroyed because the cruise lawyers instructed this and they do everything in their power to make it look as if it was your daughter&#8217;s own fault that she was violently assaulted and raped?   Ah, ok, I see your point&#8230; not that &#8220;pressing&#8221; of an issue to make cruising safer.  Ok.  gotcha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: There&#8217;s still time to fix the Cruise Vessel Security and Safety Act</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/is-congress-doing-enough-make-cruise-passengers-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-24312</link>
		<dc:creator>There&#8217;s still time to fix the Cruise Vessel Security and Safety Act</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=5044#comment-24312</guid>
		<description>[...] my July, 2008 article, Is Congress doing enough make cruise passengers safe? I wrote about the guard rail requirement. I continue to believe the 42” requirement is correct. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my July, 2008 article, Is Congress doing enough make cruise passengers safe? I wrote about the guard rail requirement. I continue to believe the 42” requirement is correct. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterGreenberg.com &#187; Travel News Roundup, July 21, 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/is-congress-doing-enough-make-cruise-passengers-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-4576</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterGreenberg.com &#187; Travel News Roundup, July 21, 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=5044#comment-4576</guid>
		<description>[...] Link: Tripso.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Link: Tripso.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ned</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/is-congress-doing-enough-make-cruise-passengers-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-4501</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=5044#comment-4501</guid>
		<description>Nate, you&#039;re correct that neither the House nor Senate bill require cruise ship employees to have background checks.  The International Cruise Victims Association suggested mandatory background checks during their testimony before Congress in 2006.  The sponsors of both the House and Senate bills decided not to include the requirement.

To the best of my knowledge all the cruise lines, at least the ones with which I&#039;m familiar, which do enter US territorial waters, and dock at US ports, do a criminal background check, and drug testing.  For example, on their employment web site, RCCL states, &quot;Royal Caribbean International and Celebrity Cruises are Equal Opportunity Employers. Employment will be subject to criminal background check, physical examinations, drug testing, and reference checks.&quot;

I think the sponsors of the bills took this into account when they framed the legislation, and the difficulty of imposing employment regulations, on companies which hire foreign nationals at locations outside the US, even for ships which do business in US territorial waters, and at US ports.

It is not in the best interests of a cruise ship company to hire a bunch of criminals, cut-throats, drunks, or drug addicts to staff their ships.  Hiring such individuals would be &quot;bad for business.&quot;  The cruise lines do their homework on prospective employees, and I don&#039;t believe that the cruise lines knowingly hire anyone like that.

I personally believe the employment practices of the cruise lines, with regard to background checks, drug testing, etc., are as good as in any industry.  Multistate, and especially multinational background checks are extremely difficult and sometimes, even the best checks will not uncover everything about each employee.

Therefore, when my family cruises, which we do often, we consider ourselves to be in a large floating city, with all the good and bad that infers.  We take the same precautions aboard a ship that we take at home, living in one of the largest cities in the US, with our belongings, and ourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate, you&#8217;re correct that neither the House nor Senate bill require cruise ship employees to have background checks.  The International Cruise Victims Association suggested mandatory background checks during their testimony before Congress in 2006.  The sponsors of both the House and Senate bills decided not to include the requirement.</p>
<p>To the best of my knowledge all the cruise lines, at least the ones with which I&#8217;m familiar, which do enter US territorial waters, and dock at US ports, do a criminal background check, and drug testing.  For example, on their employment web site, RCCL states, &#8220;Royal Caribbean International and Celebrity Cruises are Equal Opportunity Employers. Employment will be subject to criminal background check, physical examinations, drug testing, and reference checks.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think the sponsors of the bills took this into account when they framed the legislation, and the difficulty of imposing employment regulations, on companies which hire foreign nationals at locations outside the US, even for ships which do business in US territorial waters, and at US ports.</p>
<p>It is not in the best interests of a cruise ship company to hire a bunch of criminals, cut-throats, drunks, or drug addicts to staff their ships.  Hiring such individuals would be &#8220;bad for business.&#8221;  The cruise lines do their homework on prospective employees, and I don&#8217;t believe that the cruise lines knowingly hire anyone like that.</p>
<p>I personally believe the employment practices of the cruise lines, with regard to background checks, drug testing, etc., are as good as in any industry.  Multistate, and especially multinational background checks are extremely difficult and sometimes, even the best checks will not uncover everything about each employee.</p>
<p>Therefore, when my family cruises, which we do often, we consider ourselves to be in a large floating city, with all the good and bad that infers.  We take the same precautions aboard a ship that we take at home, living in one of the largest cities in the US, with our belongings, and ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marge</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/is-congress-doing-enough-make-cruise-passengers-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-4499</link>
		<dc:creator>marge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=5044#comment-4499</guid>
		<description>Great point, Nate.  In addition, cruise lines should require passengers to sign a waiver stating the passenger or other entities will not hold the cruise line company responsible should they (the passenger) lose the ability to behave properly while onboard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point, Nate.  In addition, cruise lines should require passengers to sign a waiver stating the passenger or other entities will not hold the cruise line company responsible should they (the passenger) lose the ability to behave properly while onboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/is-congress-doing-enough-make-cruise-passengers-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-4498</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=5044#comment-4498</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe that the bills pending in Congress have addressed the area of background checks for the personnel on board the various cruise ships. Why not stop a problem before it occurs? Passengers should not have to worry about crew member who may have a violent criminal record, are addicted to drugs or alcohol or are sexual deviants.  Such personnel should be banned from employment on any cruise ship, which docks at U.S. ports.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe that the bills pending in Congress have addressed the area of background checks for the personnel on board the various cruise ships. Why not stop a problem before it occurs? Passengers should not have to worry about crew member who may have a violent criminal record, are addicted to drugs or alcohol or are sexual deviants.  Such personnel should be banned from employment on any cruise ship, which docks at U.S. ports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ned</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/is-congress-doing-enough-make-cruise-passengers-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-4472</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=5044#comment-4472</guid>
		<description>Hi Marge.  I understand your feeling that Congress has very pressing issues, of bringing our young men and women home safely from the battlefield, of fiscal and economic affairs, of immigration, of job problems.  Yet, I believe Congress and the entire Federal government is capable of multitasking.

While I understand your feeling about this matter, I also empathize with Sarah Alexander, Shari Cecil, Laurie Dishman, Chantal Hopkins, Cathy Johnson, Janet Kelly, Angela Orlich, Kim Rossi, Deborah Shaffer, and far too many others who have been the victims of sexual assault while on cruises.

I don&#039;t think it&#039;s too much to ask of our Federal House and Senate, and of our President, to work to prevent crime on cruise ships and improve safety, while they tackle other issues in their work.  I think our Congress owes it to all Americas to make our lives as safe as possible through relevant and sound legislation, whether we&#039;re at home, at work, at school, at play, or on vacation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Marge.  I understand your feeling that Congress has very pressing issues, of bringing our young men and women home safely from the battlefield, of fiscal and economic affairs, of immigration, of job problems.  Yet, I believe Congress and the entire Federal government is capable of multitasking.</p>
<p>While I understand your feeling about this matter, I also empathize with Sarah Alexander, Shari Cecil, Laurie Dishman, Chantal Hopkins, Cathy Johnson, Janet Kelly, Angela Orlich, Kim Rossi, Deborah Shaffer, and far too many others who have been the victims of sexual assault while on cruises.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s too much to ask of our Federal House and Senate, and of our President, to work to prevent crime on cruise ships and improve safety, while they tackle other issues in their work.  I think our Congress owes it to all Americas to make our lives as safe as possible through relevant and sound legislation, whether we&#8217;re at home, at work, at school, at play, or on vacation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marge</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/is-congress-doing-enough-make-cruise-passengers-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-4466</link>
		<dc:creator>marge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=5044#comment-4466</guid>
		<description>Congress has  or should have their hands full of more pressing issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congress has  or should have their hands full of more pressing issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

