<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House committee focuses on passenger acceptance of whole-body scanners, artificial dog noses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/house-committee-focuses-on-passenger-acceptance-of-whole-body-scanners-artificial-dog-noses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/house-committee-focuses-on-passenger-acceptance-of-whole-body-scanners-artificial-dog-noses/</link>
	<description>The last honest travel site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Leocha</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/house-committee-focuses-on-passenger-acceptance-of-whole-body-scanners-artificial-dog-noses/comment-page-1/#comment-19641</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Leocha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumertraveler.com/?p=25037#comment-19641</guid>
		<description>@Hapgood Keep it up and you may end up on the TSA PR committee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Hapgood Keep it up and you may end up on the TSA PR committee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hapgood</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/house-committee-focuses-on-passenger-acceptance-of-whole-body-scanners-artificial-dog-noses/comment-page-1/#comment-19636</link>
		<dc:creator>Hapgood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumertraveler.com/?p=25037#comment-19636</guid>
		<description>Yes, Em Hoop, I think it will be very interesting to see what happens when the scanners start alerting on sanitary napkins, band-aids, and all manner of harmless things large numbers of people routinely carry on their persons. One of two things will happen. There will be a severe backlash from both passengers and TSA &quot;officers&quot; from all the very intimate pat-downs and searches the scans will prompt, since the &quot;officers&quot; probably aren&#039;t any more comfortable with such things than passengers. Alternatively, they&#039;ll just ignore the alarms the scanners continuously generate. 

The latter scenario will, of course, completely eliminate whatever &quot;enhanced security&quot; the scanners supposedly provide. But since the entire process is surrounded in secrecy, nobody will ever know what&#039;s happening. And the screening will probably just as effective at protecting aviation.

Name the scanners &quot;Freedom Scanners,&quot; paint them with the Flag (and perhaps a poster of the Twin Towers with the caption NEVER FORGET), and people will be eager to step into them to do their sacred patriotic duty-- even if the scanners are nothing but empty plastic boxes with a few LEDs for effect!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Em Hoop, I think it will be very interesting to see what happens when the scanners start alerting on sanitary napkins, band-aids, and all manner of harmless things large numbers of people routinely carry on their persons. One of two things will happen. There will be a severe backlash from both passengers and TSA &#8220;officers&#8221; from all the very intimate pat-downs and searches the scans will prompt, since the &#8220;officers&#8221; probably aren&#8217;t any more comfortable with such things than passengers. Alternatively, they&#8217;ll just ignore the alarms the scanners continuously generate. </p>
<p>The latter scenario will, of course, completely eliminate whatever &#8220;enhanced security&#8221; the scanners supposedly provide. But since the entire process is surrounded in secrecy, nobody will ever know what&#8217;s happening. And the screening will probably just as effective at protecting aviation.</p>
<p>Name the scanners &#8220;Freedom Scanners,&#8221; paint them with the Flag (and perhaps a poster of the Twin Towers with the caption NEVER FORGET), and people will be eager to step into them to do their sacred patriotic duty&#8211; even if the scanners are nothing but empty plastic boxes with a few LEDs for effect!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Em Hoop</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/house-committee-focuses-on-passenger-acceptance-of-whole-body-scanners-artificial-dog-noses/comment-page-1/#comment-19613</link>
		<dc:creator>Em Hoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumertraveler.com/?p=25037#comment-19613</guid>
		<description>Hapgood...thanks for saving me the time it would take to write what you have written.....And you&#039;ve left out my caustic comments, too. Have you sent your excellent précis to our esteemed (LOL) congressmen?

I can imagine the fuss next time i travel in a muu-muu and hold up the line to strip down to my undies....and maybe hand some poor underpaid TSA person (who thought this job was going to be as easy as the paycheck would  indicate) a rubber glove and invite him to finish his search......ah, airport security theatre at its most undignified and explicit...........curtain rises......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hapgood&#8230;thanks for saving me the time it would take to write what you have written&#8230;..And you&#8217;ve left out my caustic comments, too. Have you sent your excellent précis to our esteemed (LOL) congressmen?</p>
<p>I can imagine the fuss next time i travel in a muu-muu and hold up the line to strip down to my undies&#8230;.and maybe hand some poor underpaid TSA person (who thought this job was going to be as easy as the paycheck would  indicate) a rubber glove and invite him to finish his search&#8230;&#8230;ah, airport security theatre at its most undignified and explicit&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..curtain rises&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hapgood</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/house-committee-focuses-on-passenger-acceptance-of-whole-body-scanners-artificial-dog-noses/comment-page-1/#comment-19579</link>
		<dc:creator>Hapgood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumertraveler.com/?p=25037#comment-19579</guid>
		<description>The focus is not surprising, given that questioning or challenging the TSA about its effectiveness or competence would be political suicide. The only message here is that the TSA&#039;s propaganda department needs to put more effort into hiding unpleasant truths, lying, spinning, and otherwise deceiving the public into accepting (and preferably welcoming) a strip search as the prerequisite for flying. Renaming it &quot;Advanced Imaging Technology&quot; is a start, although something like  &quot;User Friendly Protective Scanning&quot; or &quot;Advanced Privacy Protective Scanning&quot; might be better if they combine it with a suitable logo and advertise it enough. Or else they could call it a &quot;Patriot Scanner,&quot; implying that failing to embrace it wholeheartedly is unpatriotic. 

Or better yet, they could hire Karl Rove as a consultant. The Republicans have found a very successful strategy of distilling their view of complicated political issues into simple slogans that are consistently and relentlessly repeated until their &quot;base&quot; accepts them as Established Fact, regardless of whether they contain any truth. Maybe they can get Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity to tell their many fans about the new advanced scanners that &quot;protect us from terrorists and protect our privacy,&quot; while mocking those who call them &quot;strip searches&quot; as liberals who hate America. That sort of campaign would probably be the most effective way to get public acceptance, while drowning out those unpatriotic questions about effectiveness and privacy. 

Security theater works because people buy into it. The key is to get more people to buy into it and discredit those who don&#039;t. That&#039;s a much easier task than actually providing effective security, or correcting the failures that continue to get in the way of stopping plots before they get to the airport.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The focus is not surprising, given that questioning or challenging the TSA about its effectiveness or competence would be political suicide. The only message here is that the TSA&#8217;s propaganda department needs to put more effort into hiding unpleasant truths, lying, spinning, and otherwise deceiving the public into accepting (and preferably welcoming) a strip search as the prerequisite for flying. Renaming it &#8220;Advanced Imaging Technology&#8221; is a start, although something like  &#8220;User Friendly Protective Scanning&#8221; or &#8220;Advanced Privacy Protective Scanning&#8221; might be better if they combine it with a suitable logo and advertise it enough. Or else they could call it a &#8220;Patriot Scanner,&#8221; implying that failing to embrace it wholeheartedly is unpatriotic. </p>
<p>Or better yet, they could hire Karl Rove as a consultant. The Republicans have found a very successful strategy of distilling their view of complicated political issues into simple slogans that are consistently and relentlessly repeated until their &#8220;base&#8221; accepts them as Established Fact, regardless of whether they contain any truth. Maybe they can get Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity to tell their many fans about the new advanced scanners that &#8220;protect us from terrorists and protect our privacy,&#8221; while mocking those who call them &#8220;strip searches&#8221; as liberals who hate America. That sort of campaign would probably be the most effective way to get public acceptance, while drowning out those unpatriotic questions about effectiveness and privacy. </p>
<p>Security theater works because people buy into it. The key is to get more people to buy into it and discredit those who don&#8217;t. That&#8217;s a much easier task than actually providing effective security, or correcting the failures that continue to get in the way of stopping plots before they get to the airport.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

