Here’s an idea that could help keep the cruise industry afloat

by Janice Hough on July 15, 2009

Most travel agents have probably been on both sides of this one. There’s the client who wants to sail somewhere at the last minute, or within a month or two of sailing, and the ship is sold out. And then there’s the client who has booked early, often at a super discounted rate, but would really rather now go another time. But the cancellation fees are 50 to 100 percent.

In my current case, I have clients who want to pay Princess Cruise Lines full price for an Alaska sailing from San Francisco in August, but the cabins are full. And they are at the top of the waitlist, but they will need a cancellation to get on.

In this situation, if passengers who have already paid to cancel, they could lose almost everything unless they have insurance. And some insurances pay nothing, for example, if it is a job situation, or a minor medical issue that is just a question of comfort. But if there is a cancellation, Princess could be paid almost double for the one cabin.

Most of the time, however, when I have had a client under heavy penalty where there’s any discretion at all, they decide to go, rather than losing the money. But if the penalty was reduced, they would have changed to a different date.

Since cruise lines, like most of the travel industry, are going through tough times, here’s a suggestion:

When cruises have significant waitlists, offer booked passengers a reduced penalty to switch to a different cruise. Then the cruise line would still make extra money on a cabin, the penalty plus the new, probably higher fare for the waitlisted clients.

The reduced penalty could even only kick in if some passengers accept the waitlist. And similarly, a cruise line trying such a system could make the waitlist deposit nonrefundable if space was confirmed and the passengers then declined the cabin.

Clearly, this wouldn’t be for everyone, and any cruise line that started the program could review and cancel it if it were too much trouble. But when cruise lines are looking for any possible source of revenue, it could be easier than more art auctions and bingo games.

Print Friendly

  • The man who notices things

    cancellation penalties are stupid. In the case you cite, they actually prevent the company from making money. Instead of selling a new cabin, they resut in the loss of sale of cabin. If they let the first couple who wants to defer their cruise do so, they sell the new cabin and get more money for the resold one. Yet, because they think cancellation penalties make them money, they dig in their heels and refuse to cooperate with the transaction.

    Of course, it is not likely that any cruise makes money off the cabins – they make their money off the extras. the kick backs from shore excursions, liquor, soda, etc.

  • John

    Easier solution … Make cruises transferable for a fee. Then the two parties can agree on their own price and the Cruise line still gets a cut

  • http://www.northstarcruises.com.au cruises Australia

    Actually sounds like a good idea, getting the word out and centralizing the process may be difficult though. Would likely encourage more last minute cruise bookings. as well as give those booked a bit of peace of mind that they have that option.

  • John

    Janice … your idea only works if cruise pricing were static (which we all know its not).

    So what amounts are refunded…. what the individual paid or what the cruise is selling for now?

    How about the buyer? Do they pay the current rate or the rate that the original cruise goer paid.

    What happens when no one is on the waiting list for that cabin type but are for others? Does the cruise line get sued in small claims court (carver’s answer to everything)

    Its not just as simple as saying that the cruise line is getting away with something. All of these questions need to be answered ahead of time

Previous post:

Next post: