http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/dont-lose-your-cruise-discount-at-the-pier/ The last honest travel site Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:50:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/dont-lose-your-cruise-discount-at-the-pier/comment-page-1/#comment-13421 The Good Doctor Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:33:57 +0000 http://www.tripso.com/?p=15974#comment-13421 I'm wondering what the travel agent's culpability is - did she knowingly offer the WV discount to the entire traveling party in order to clinch the sale? Did she recommend that the party split the West Virginians among the different cabins to spread the discount? All we've heard from are the poor "victims," but to paraphrase Paul Harvey, we're waiting to hear "the rest of the story." I’m wondering what the travel agent’s culpability is – did she knowingly offer the WV discount to the entire traveling party in order to clinch the sale? Did she recommend that the party split the West Virginians among the different cabins to spread the discount? All we’ve heard from are the poor “victims,” but to paraphrase Paul Harvey, we’re waiting to hear “the rest of the story.”

]]> http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/dont-lose-your-cruise-discount-at-the-pier/comment-page-1/#comment-13412 Paula Demmer Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:35:20 +0000 http://www.tripso.com/?p=15974#comment-13412 Excellent point on the fact that many discounts are booked on the honor system but require proof at the PIER! Thanks for a well written explanation. Excellent point on the fact that many discounts are booked on the honor system but require proof at the PIER! Thanks for a well written explanation.

]]> http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/dont-lose-your-cruise-discount-at-the-pier/comment-page-1/#comment-13348 Ann, CTC Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:24:25 +0000 http://www.tripso.com/?p=15974#comment-13348 Not to be cynical or anything, but why does it take a travel agent to explain what Chris should have found out (and explained) in his column as to what might have happened? You column should be a follow-up to his, where he found out exactly what the agent did, good or bad. Isn't that good journalism? Getting the whole story? Not to be cynical or anything, but why does it take a travel agent to explain what Chris should have found out (and explained) in his column as to what might have happened? You column should be a follow-up to his, where he found out exactly what the agent did, good or bad. Isn’t that good journalism? Getting the whole story?

]]>