Airlines that do what they do well, make money

by Charlie Leocha on September 2, 2008

Midst the weeping and wailing about high jet fuel prices and the litany of excuses from airline executives like, “Airlines can’t make money with $120 a barrel oil,” some airlines are making money. The airlines that focus on their strengths and put customers first are raking in millions.

After the most recent earnings season for the airlines it struck me that airlines that pay attention to excellence in terms of customer service, even at high prices, and those that pay attention to giving passengers great value in transportation are still making money. Even making millions of dollars or euros with record oil prices.

Here is my, off the top of my head, current honor roll of profitable airlines that make my point. Emirates Airlines and Virgin Atlantic Airlines both focus on giving the high-end and business passenger what they want. They both are flying high.

Emirates Airlines

Net income in the six months to March 31 rose to 1.9 billion dirhams ($517.4 million) from 1.58 billion dirhams in the year-earlier period, Reuters calculated based on full-year data the company released in Dubai on Thursday.

The Group’s latest record performance reflects its success in growing customer demand through the strategic expansion of its business operations across six continents, supported by ongoing investments in the latest technology, products and customer service while keeping a tight rein on costs. This is illustrated by the 21.2 million passengers who flew with Emirates in the latest financial year, 3.7 million more than in the previous year.

Virgin Atlantic

The carrier shared that a rise in business class travel helped more than double its pretax, pre-exceptional performance, which stood at 20.1 million pounds for the year ago period. Sales were up 17 percent for its financial year, which ended on February 28.

Carrying a record 4.9 million passengers, Virgin had a 2005-06 pre-tax, pre-exceptional items profit of £41.6m – more than double the figure for 2004-05.

The world’s low cost carriers are also making gobs of money. Southwest Airlines here in the USA is at the top of the heap and the three biggest low-cost carriers in Europe all made money this year. They are providing passengers real value. Value that travelers return time and time again to enjoy.

Southwest Airlines

Southwest said today it earned $321 million, or 44 cents per share, up 15 percent from a year ago, when the airline earned $278 million, or 36 cents per share. Excluding special items, Southwest said it would have earned $121 million, or 16 cents per share. That beat analysts’ forecast of 12 cents per share, according to a survey by Thomson Financial.

Ryanair

The Irish firm made 43.8m euros (£31m) during April, May and June, in line with expectations. “During what BA last week described as the most testing period in aviation history, we continue to …deliver increased profits,” said chief executive Michael O’Leary.

Easy Jet

The low-cost airline has managed to offset over 50 per cent of the expected increase in its fuel bill, but says pre-tax profits are set to fall to between £110 million and £120 million for the year to the end of September, compared with £191 million last year.

Air Berlin

The Berlin-based company, whose airlines include LTU, Niki, Belair and LGW, earned €8.3 million (US$12.26 million) in the second quarter, compared with a loss of €59 million a year earlier, when it booked charges related to the acquisitions of LTU and Belair.

That helped push Air Berlin shares up more than 2.5 percent to €3.99 (US$5.89) in Frankfurt trading.

Sales rose 6.7 percent to €869.5 million (US$1.3 billion) in the quarter, compared with €654.5 million last year. Its pretax profit fell to €13.8 million (US$20.4 million) from €18.7 million, a decline the airline blamed on high costs in starting new routes to China as well as fees paid to consultants in its aborted attempt to acquire Condor.

There are other airlines that are making money, even in difficult financial times. The common denominator for these airlines is that they are giving their passengers what they want. Airlines known for the best frills are delivering more than ever before with showers on Emirates and better beds on Virgin Atlantic. Airlines known for low prices are growing both their passenger base and their profits by focusing on providing the best value on their respective routes.

Give customers what they want and most businesses will make money.

Print Friendly

  • Mary H

    Virgin Atlantic just made me a happy traveler.
    They have my loyalty and all it took was one round-trip.

    Let the whiners cry in their beer. It’s all they deserve for using the “surefire failure” business model. I like VA champagne. And toast the VA people.

  • Michael

    Southwest has been making me happy for years…….their prices are fair; they don’t use hidden fees to increase their income; they don’t charge you to change your ticket; they give you a free ticket for every 16 flights you take–and they are tickets you can actually use; they arrive and depart on time virtually all the time; they are friendly and courteous almost all of the time; and they don’t whine about why they can’t make a profit.

    They also don’t pay their executives enormous and outrageous salaries.

  • Frank

    Just what kind of profits would SOUTHWEST have made if they had “NOT” HEDGED their FUEL?

    ANYONE?

  • Mike

    Frank, I don’t know. Southwest used its financial position to secure itself a relatively stable price for a big part of its operating cost. Seems pretty smart to me.

    I don’t really like the no frills model, but it works well for Southwest. I know lots of people who don’t look anywhere else unless Southwest doesn’t fly where they need to go.

    Too bad we don’t have even one major carrier trying to adopt the Virgin Atlantic or Emirates model. Instead they are all racing to calculate how much weight they can save by eliminating this or that amenity.

  • Matthew B

    These airlines also don’t borrow money like they’re a regulated utility either. Southwest has very low levels of debt compared to the US legacy carriers, when you don’t pay out so much in interest you can make a profit. Southwest has been profitable for thirty-five years, this seems to lead to less stress for everyone involved, leading to much happier, customer focused staff. Where a company is in an out of bankruptcy, or teetering on the edge, management are looking to save every penny, screw the staff out of wage increases, strip out benefits, and make life pretty miserable for everyone in the airline. This leads to stressed out, unhappy employees, whose customer service suffers as a result. There is a lot to be said for Southwest’s no frills, low debt company policies. No frills flying = low customer expectation for frills = no one complains when they don’t get free cocktails.

  • Frank

    On September 3rd, 2008 at 1:58 am Mike said: Southwest used its financial position to secure itself a relatively stable price for a big part of its operating cost. Seems pretty smart to me.
    =========================================================

    Well said, Mike. Third quarter results for the airline industry will be out after this month. I suspect large losses over all, even though it was the HIGH season, summer travel quarter. All those passengers bought their tickets months and months ago. Those fares dont reflect the high cost of FUEL that is plaguing the industry today.
    A good debate would be if Southwest’s “business model” will continue to make them money. Take away their fuel hedging and the debate begins. Their labor costs have crept up over the years. And, their load factors are generally lower then the legacy carriers.
    Mr Leocha uses ONE domestic carrier in his article. Which certainly doesnt reflect the US industry as a whole. Those HIGH FUEL COSTS have caused several bankruptcies and liquidations. It’s because of those fuel costs, the whole business model has changed the industry. Right now, it’s who has ample capital to cover those losses from fuel COSTS.

  • Frank

Previous post:

Next post: