<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Airlines sick-leave rules force sick flight attendants to work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/airlines-sick-leave-rules-force-sick-flight-attendants-to-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/airlines-sick-leave-rules-force-sick-flight-attendants-to-work/</link>
	<description>The last honest travel site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer (the other one)</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/airlines-sick-leave-rules-force-sick-flight-attendants-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-12537</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer (the other one)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 05:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=14625#comment-12537</guid>
		<description>No one&#039;s forcing FA&#039;s to work under those rules... enough of them obviously think it&#039;s worth it, or there&#039;d be a huge shortage.  Airlines are certainly not the only companies that are stingy about sick leave - they&#039;re not even the worst.  None of this needs to be a government issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one&#8217;s forcing FA&#8217;s to work under those rules&#8230; enough of them obviously think it&#8217;s worth it, or there&#8217;d be a huge shortage.  Airlines are certainly not the only companies that are stingy about sick leave &#8211; they&#8217;re not even the worst.  None of this needs to be a government issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/airlines-sick-leave-rules-force-sick-flight-attendants-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-12497</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=14625#comment-12497</guid>
		<description>On May 27th, 2009 at 11:24 am Carlo said . If you hire the right employees in the first place, they won’t abuse their sick leave. If they are abusing their sick leave, then you haven’t hired the right people.
==========================================================

Frank &lt;-----has called in sick, three times in the past ten years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On May 27th, 2009 at 11:24 am Carlo said . If you hire the right employees in the first place, they won’t abuse their sick leave. If they are abusing their sick leave, then you haven’t hired the right people.<br />
==========================================================</p>
<p>Frank &lt;&#8212;&#8211;has called in sick, three times in the past ten years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/airlines-sick-leave-rules-force-sick-flight-attendants-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-12496</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=14625#comment-12496</guid>
		<description>On May 27th, 2009 at 12:04 pm John said @Frank
Since negotiation is a two way street, I guess added sick days are not that important to FAs. If it was, they would give up something else to get additional ones.
===========================================================

Typical MANAGEMENT style answer.  John.  So, they keep sick days competitive with other carriers, they offer something else of lesser value, but is more important to the (F/A) membership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On May 27th, 2009 at 12:04 pm John said @Frank<br />
Since negotiation is a two way street, I guess added sick days are not that important to FAs. If it was, they would give up something else to get additional ones.<br />
===========================================================</p>
<p>Typical MANAGEMENT style answer.  John.  So, they keep sick days competitive with other carriers, they offer something else of lesser value, but is more important to the (F/A) membership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/airlines-sick-leave-rules-force-sick-flight-attendants-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-12462</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=14625#comment-12462</guid>
		<description>@Frank
        Since negotiation is a two way street, I guess added sick days are not that important to FAs. If it was, they would give up something else to get additional ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Frank<br />
        Since negotiation is a two way street, I guess added sick days are not that important to FAs. If it was, they would give up something else to get additional ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlo</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/airlines-sick-leave-rules-force-sick-flight-attendants-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-12461</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 16:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=14625#comment-12461</guid>
		<description>Where have you been, Frank?  About time you chimed in on something.  I&#039;ll second that.  Two sick calls a year is ridiculous.  I don&#039;t know what kind of sick leave FAs get, but I always get into a debate about what&#039;s the use in having sick leave if you&#039;re not allowed to use it.  If you hire the right employees in the first place, they won&#039;t abuse their sick leave.  If they are abusing their sick leave, then you haven&#039;t hired the right people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where have you been, Frank?  About time you chimed in on something.  I&#8217;ll second that.  Two sick calls a year is ridiculous.  I don&#8217;t know what kind of sick leave FAs get, but I always get into a debate about what&#8217;s the use in having sick leave if you&#8217;re not allowed to use it.  If you hire the right employees in the first place, they won&#8217;t abuse their sick leave.  If they are abusing their sick leave, then you haven&#8217;t hired the right people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/airlines-sick-leave-rules-force-sick-flight-attendants-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-12458</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=14625#comment-12458</guid>
		<description>On May 27th, 2009 at 7:04 am John 
If the union wants different work rules, that’s what contract negoiation is for. You know the periodic thing where the union and management sit down and work out a deal that both find agreeable. We really don’t need the government stepping in again.
==========================================================

WHAT!!!  How many times do these negotiations drag on for years and years past the amendable date?  Why do you think this industry is riddled with labor disputes?  I say, step in, government, stop those multi-million dollar bonuses for management.
Most companies allow flight attendants TWO SICK CALLS per year.  Yet, they&#039;re in close contact, in a confined space with hundreds and hundreds of passengers per week.  Can you imagine watching television and an outbreak (illness) happens in a city where you&#039;ve scheduled yourself a month in advance?
Care to use ONE of your sick calls?  How about a maintenance issue with an aircraft?  Remember the grounding of the DC-10 in 78?  Would YOU want to fly it UNTIL they decide to ground it and that&#039;s even if they do?
Flight Attendants are supposed to be concerned with SAFETY.  Unfortunately, for management, at times OUR safety is our number one priority!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On May 27th, 2009 at 7:04 am John<br />
If the union wants different work rules, that’s what contract negoiation is for. You know the periodic thing where the union and management sit down and work out a deal that both find agreeable. We really don’t need the government stepping in again.<br />
==========================================================</p>
<p>WHAT!!!  How many times do these negotiations drag on for years and years past the amendable date?  Why do you think this industry is riddled with labor disputes?  I say, step in, government, stop those multi-million dollar bonuses for management.<br />
Most companies allow flight attendants TWO SICK CALLS per year.  Yet, they&#8217;re in close contact, in a confined space with hundreds and hundreds of passengers per week.  Can you imagine watching television and an outbreak (illness) happens in a city where you&#8217;ve scheduled yourself a month in advance?<br />
Care to use ONE of your sick calls?  How about a maintenance issue with an aircraft?  Remember the grounding of the DC-10 in 78?  Would YOU want to fly it UNTIL they decide to ground it and that&#8217;s even if they do?<br />
Flight Attendants are supposed to be concerned with SAFETY.  Unfortunately, for management, at times OUR safety is our number one priority!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/today/airlines-sick-leave-rules-force-sick-flight-attendants-to-work/comment-page-1/#comment-12451</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 12:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tripso.com/?p=14625#comment-12451</guid>
		<description>Charlie ... Do you just not like the airlines? Could you find a story anywhere where you don&#039;t knock the airlines? How about some journalism and get a quote from the airlines on why the policies exist? 

I worked in the management of a Unionized company (hint: your and I are going to own a majority share before too long). I saw these types of policies enacted because people just didn&#039;t show up for work. They would then show up with a doctor&#039;s note from a local clinic known for writing a cannot work note for a stubbed toe. It got bad enough that the union agreed to an attendance plan.

If the union wants different work rules, that&#039;s what contract negoiation is for. You know the periodic thing where the union and management sit down and work out a deal that both find agreeable. We really don&#039;t need the government stepping in again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie &#8230; Do you just not like the airlines? Could you find a story anywhere where you don&#8217;t knock the airlines? How about some journalism and get a quote from the airlines on why the policies exist? </p>
<p>I worked in the management of a Unionized company (hint: your and I are going to own a majority share before too long). I saw these types of policies enacted because people just didn&#8217;t show up for work. They would then show up with a doctor&#8217;s note from a local clinic known for writing a cannot work note for a stubbed toe. It got bad enough that the union agreed to an attendance plan.</p>
<p>If the union wants different work rules, that&#8217;s what contract negoiation is for. You know the periodic thing where the union and management sit down and work out a deal that both find agreeable. We really don&#8217;t need the government stepping in again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

