|01-02-2008, 08:11 AM||#1|
Super Duper Über Poster
Member since: Jul 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
Rep Power: 461
Airline/Passenger trends in the new year
In an article in TravelMole.com today, Top ten airline passenger trends and issues for 2008, David Wilkening lists the top air travel issues, according to the Air Travelers Association.
If the US government continues to delay implementation of the new air traffic control system, as ATA predicts the consequences will be huge, and will become the overriding cause of a US domestic air transportation system which will dive into complete chaos by the middle of the next decade in my opinion. Personally, I think Congress is beginning to realize this and will not allow it to happen, as it will mean votes.
Based on the model of US Airways, I definitely expect more regional jets in the future as they are so cost effective. The question is however, how far will they fly. I find flights on regional jets having a duration of more than 2.5 hours to be unacceptable, and have switched to flights on standard aircraft at a higher price to avoid them. When Boeing's and Airbus' next generation of planes starts flying, I'm wondering if that will stop, or at least slow down this trend for the longer routes using the regional jets, considering the expected efficiency of the 787 and the A350.
Personally, I think the battle of the A380 and the 787 began long ago. So far the 787 is winning the battle, and its my belief that financially it will win the war, due to the huge cost overruns of the A380. Had that not occurred, things would be vastly different. The problem for the A380 is, and has always been the number of routes that support can support it, versus the 787. Travelers want to fly when the want to fly. For the A380 to fly on very many routes, the number of flights per day between cities will have to substantially shrink, and while that's part of the strength of the A380, it's clearly it's biggest weakness, and problem for Airbus to sell more than 450 of these planes.
Most of the rest of the list is pretty obvious.
|01-02-2008, 10:15 AM||#2|
Member since: Dec 2005
Location: Marlton, NJ
Rep Power: 257
Congress will probably do something. The problem will be in the implementation of whatever they do. The process will go something like this. Congress votes $5 billion to 'modernize the system' with no specifics. The FAA will 'explore possibilities'. An earmark will then send the money to some contractor in a politician from whom someone needs a favor, regardless of experience with that kind of system (for once, Boeing SHOULD get a contract!). There will be delays, cost overruns, scope. Then, a congressional hearing why the money wasn't spent as THEY intended.
#3 - While I agree with the principle, as I have bemoaned many a time before, people vote with their wallet. As long as a regional jet is $10 cheaper, there won't be the groundswell of outrage needed to change this. The more likely catalyst will be the abovementioned capacity caps if they ever happen.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|For the 7th time this year at LAX: Two passenger jets almost collide!||Ned||By air||4||08-19-2007 10:28 AM|
|Travel Trends for the New Year||mtp51||Travel News, Rumors, Scuttlebutt and Gossip||3||01-18-2007 03:04 PM|