<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thanks Amtrak, for fast thinking and quick action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/thanks-amtrak-for-fast-thinking-and-quick-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/thanks-amtrak-for-fast-thinking-and-quick-action/</link>
	<description>The last honest travel site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eagle Lover</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/thanks-amtrak-for-fast-thinking-and-quick-action/comment-page-1/#comment-19895</link>
		<dc:creator>Eagle Lover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 01:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumertraveler.com/?p=25231#comment-19895</guid>
		<description>It is great to read such intelligent dialogue!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is great to read such intelligent dialogue!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie Charney</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/thanks-amtrak-for-fast-thinking-and-quick-action/comment-page-1/#comment-19714</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie Charney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumertraveler.com/?p=25231#comment-19714</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Ned. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Ned. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/thanks-amtrak-for-fast-thinking-and-quick-action/comment-page-1/#comment-19713</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumertraveler.com/?p=25231#comment-19713</guid>
		<description>We chose our current season subscription, specifically for Saturday’s opera, Simon Boccanegra, mostly because Plácido Domingo was set to perform the lead role, in this opera, for his first time. In our opinion, he is the world’s greatest living active male opera star. His voice is amazing, and his acting wonderful.
==================================================

Very gracious man.  I&#039;ve had Placido Domingo on several flights with his wife, Marta.  Enjoyed talking with them.  Kind couple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We chose our current season subscription, specifically for Saturday’s opera, Simon Boccanegra, mostly because Plácido Domingo was set to perform the lead role, in this opera, for his first time. In our opinion, he is the world’s greatest living active male opera star. His voice is amazing, and his acting wonderful.<br />
==================================================</p>
<p>Very gracious man.  I&#8217;ve had Placido Domingo on several flights with his wife, Marta.  Enjoyed talking with them.  Kind couple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ned Levi</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/thanks-amtrak-for-fast-thinking-and-quick-action/comment-page-1/#comment-19712</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned Levi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumertraveler.com/?p=25231#comment-19712</guid>
		<description>It turns out that all modes of transportation (not cruise ships as far as I know) are heavily subsidized, road, rail, and air. To single out rail&#039;s subsidy is unfair, in my opinion.

The Federal Highway Trust Fund, and the Aviation Fund are funded by their respective users, but the amount of funds expended by these funds are not the only expenditures by the federal, state and local governments for roads and aviation. The simple fact is that considerable general tax revenue helps fund all these transportation modes. None of these transportation modes could operate without their sizable subsidies.

In particular, Amtrak sufferred from having to run specific highly unprofitable routes required of them by the Federal government to get funding. While those requirements were finally lifted, members of the US Congress have made it clear that if Amtrak didn&#039;t keep running many of their unprofitable routes their funding would be substantially cut.

By the way Carrie, I sent a letter today to NJT thanking them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It turns out that all modes of transportation (not cruise ships as far as I know) are heavily subsidized, road, rail, and air. To single out rail&#8217;s subsidy is unfair, in my opinion.</p>
<p>The Federal Highway Trust Fund, and the Aviation Fund are funded by their respective users, but the amount of funds expended by these funds are not the only expenditures by the federal, state and local governments for roads and aviation. The simple fact is that considerable general tax revenue helps fund all these transportation modes. None of these transportation modes could operate without their sizable subsidies.</p>
<p>In particular, Amtrak sufferred from having to run specific highly unprofitable routes required of them by the Federal government to get funding. While those requirements were finally lifted, members of the US Congress have made it clear that if Amtrak didn&#8217;t keep running many of their unprofitable routes their funding would be substantially cut.</p>
<p>By the way Carrie, I sent a letter today to NJT thanking them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kairho</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/thanks-amtrak-for-fast-thinking-and-quick-action/comment-page-1/#comment-19711</link>
		<dc:creator>Kairho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumertraveler.com/?p=25231#comment-19711</guid>
		<description>Fortunately, the national subsidy for Amtrak amounts to only about $5 a year per person.  Of course a little here, a little there applied.  But nonetheless, it&#039;s not all that bad for a national rail system.  In fact, it needs to be increased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fortunately, the national subsidy for Amtrak amounts to only about $5 a year per person.  Of course a little here, a little there applied.  But nonetheless, it&#8217;s not all that bad for a national rail system.  In fact, it needs to be increased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/thanks-amtrak-for-fast-thinking-and-quick-action/comment-page-1/#comment-19710</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumertraveler.com/?p=25231#comment-19710</guid>
		<description>But, Arizona Road Warrior, aren&#039;t a lot of the expense of flight (controllers, the whole airport infrastructure, aircraft development, etc.) also government-subsidized?  And the entire Interstate system that cars and trucks use?  And local transit systems too?  Why does a service as basic as transportation have to &quot;cover its costs&quot;, any more than do - say - the police, the fire department, and health care?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, Arizona Road Warrior, aren&#8217;t a lot of the expense of flight (controllers, the whole airport infrastructure, aircraft development, etc.) also government-subsidized?  And the entire Interstate system that cars and trucks use?  And local transit systems too?  Why does a service as basic as transportation have to &#8220;cover its costs&#8221;, any more than do &#8211; say &#8211; the police, the fire department, and health care?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie Charney</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/thanks-amtrak-for-fast-thinking-and-quick-action/comment-page-1/#comment-19706</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie Charney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumertraveler.com/?p=25231#comment-19706</guid>
		<description>How about some kudos and thanks for the New Jersey Transit crew? Surely they deserve some appreciation! They had to interrupt their schedule to help you guys out. As a fairly regular traveler on both Amtrak (Northeast Corridor route) and New Jersey Transit (Mainline Bergen route +) I can attest that service with a smile has been great on both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about some kudos and thanks for the New Jersey Transit crew? Surely they deserve some appreciation! They had to interrupt their schedule to help you guys out. As a fairly regular traveler on both Amtrak (Northeast Corridor route) and New Jersey Transit (Mainline Bergen route +) I can attest that service with a smile has been great on both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Stallings</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/thanks-amtrak-for-fast-thinking-and-quick-action/comment-page-1/#comment-19704</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Stallings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumertraveler.com/?p=25231#comment-19704</guid>
		<description>On the contrary, Arizona Road Warrior, Amtrak service in the Northeast Corridor is both well-run and profitable. It is, perhaps, the only part of Amtrak&#039;s vast network that could stand on its own. Amtrak&#039;s problems in the rest of the country notwithstanding, subsidizing costs is not the problem here. And I wouldn&#039;t really say Amtrak is &quot;cheap&quot;. It&#039;s rather expensive; it&#039;s just that airfares are more expensive.  

In my opinion, the problem with Amtrak is not so much subsidizing fares but having to use scant profits on singular routes to subsidize unneeded and underused service on routes that are not and could not ever be profitable (but are required because a Congressman or Senator demands that a certain route not be dropped).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the contrary, Arizona Road Warrior, Amtrak service in the Northeast Corridor is both well-run and profitable. It is, perhaps, the only part of Amtrak&#8217;s vast network that could stand on its own. Amtrak&#8217;s problems in the rest of the country notwithstanding, subsidizing costs is not the problem here. And I wouldn&#8217;t really say Amtrak is &#8220;cheap&#8221;. It&#8217;s rather expensive; it&#8217;s just that airfares are more expensive.  </p>
<p>In my opinion, the problem with Amtrak is not so much subsidizing fares but having to use scant profits on singular routes to subsidize unneeded and underused service on routes that are not and could not ever be profitable (but are required because a Congressman or Senator demands that a certain route not be dropped).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Train Tickets USA &#124; Train Tickets USA</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/thanks-amtrak-for-fast-thinking-and-quick-action/comment-page-1/#comment-19703</link>
		<dc:creator>Train Tickets USA &#124; Train Tickets USA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumertraveler.com/?p=25231#comment-19703</guid>
		<description>[...]  Thanks Amtrak, for fast thinking and quick action  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Thanks Amtrak, for fast thinking and quick action  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arizona Road Warrior</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/thanks-amtrak-for-fast-thinking-and-quick-action/comment-page-1/#comment-19701</link>
		<dc:creator>Arizona Road Warrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumertraveler.com/?p=25231#comment-19701</guid>
		<description>@ MidMom8949:  It is cheaper than flying because Amtrak isn&#039;t charging high enough fares to cover their costs; therefore, taxpayers like me who have no access to Amtrak are subsidizing your travel expenditures.  When will Amtrak increase their fares so that they can at least break even?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ MidMom8949:  It is cheaper than flying because Amtrak isn&#8217;t charging high enough fares to cover their costs; therefore, taxpayers like me who have no access to Amtrak are subsidizing your travel expenditures.  When will Amtrak increase their fares so that they can at least break even?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

