<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Packing your carry-ons defensively</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/packing-your-carry-ons-defensively/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/packing-your-carry-ons-defensively/</link>
	<description>The last honest travel site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/packing-your-carry-ons-defensively/comment-page-1/#comment-20173</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumertraveler.com/?p=24635#comment-20173</guid>
		<description>Ned, this is an extremely informative piece and I think you’ve given some excellent tips on how to pack carry-ons. I especially like the point about size limitations for carry-ons. Many a time I see obstinate passengers struggling to fit their even more obstinate carry-on bags in the overhead compartment to the chagrin of fellow passengers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ned, this is an extremely informative piece and I think you’ve given some excellent tips on how to pack carry-ons. I especially like the point about size limitations for carry-ons. Many a time I see obstinate passengers struggling to fit their even more obstinate carry-on bags in the overhead compartment to the chagrin of fellow passengers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ&#8217;s Travel Favorites 1-31-10 &#124; Traveling with MJ</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/packing-your-carry-ons-defensively/comment-page-1/#comment-19461</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ&#8217;s Travel Favorites 1-31-10 &#124; Traveling with MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 14:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumertraveler.com/?p=24635#comment-19461</guid>
		<description>[...] Consumer Traveler offers some defensive packing tips.  Packing is one of those things that I’m good at, rarely taking too much, and I can personally attest that these are some good suggestions.  Oh, and if you can’t lift or carry around your bag – check it! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Consumer Traveler offers some defensive packing tips.  Packing is one of those things that I’m good at, rarely taking too much, and I can personally attest that these are some good suggestions.  Oh, and if you can’t lift or carry around your bag – check it! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ned Levi</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/packing-your-carry-ons-defensively/comment-page-1/#comment-19300</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned Levi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumertraveler.com/?p=24635#comment-19300</guid>
		<description>I wanted to take the time to respond to the suggestion of using cargo pants in a similar way to my suggestion of a photographer&#039;s vest to carry belongings while traveling, including through the airport. While on the surface it sounds like a great idea, and outside the airport I even use this type of pants, for airports, cargo pants aren&#039;t great.

When you go through security you can easily take off a photographer&#039;s vest, place it in a tray after ensuring all your pockets are zipped or snapped, and have it x-rayed. Then at the end of the x-ray line put it on again, no muss, no fuss.

On the other hand, if you&#039;ve filled the pockets of your cargo pants, you&#039;ve got to empty those pockets and place all of its contents in a tray(s), and they reload after your tray comes out. That puts those belongings, now loose in the trays, at risk for theft, or even being left behind (It&#039;s hard to believe, but TSA personnel have confirmed to me, and I&#039;ve seen the stockpile at a couple of airports, that passengers actually leave many belongings behind by accident or forgetfulness, including cameras, mp3 players, and cellphones.) Moreover, using cargo pants at security, in my opinion, is a pain in the neck.

In the airport, I&#039;m sticking to my vest. Beyond the above, a photographer&#039;s vest has much more capacity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to take the time to respond to the suggestion of using cargo pants in a similar way to my suggestion of a photographer&#8217;s vest to carry belongings while traveling, including through the airport. While on the surface it sounds like a great idea, and outside the airport I even use this type of pants, for airports, cargo pants aren&#8217;t great.</p>
<p>When you go through security you can easily take off a photographer&#8217;s vest, place it in a tray after ensuring all your pockets are zipped or snapped, and have it x-rayed. Then at the end of the x-ray line put it on again, no muss, no fuss.</p>
<p>On the other hand, if you&#8217;ve filled the pockets of your cargo pants, you&#8217;ve got to empty those pockets and place all of its contents in a tray(s), and they reload after your tray comes out. That puts those belongings, now loose in the trays, at risk for theft, or even being left behind (It&#8217;s hard to believe, but TSA personnel have confirmed to me, and I&#8217;ve seen the stockpile at a couple of airports, that passengers actually leave many belongings behind by accident or forgetfulness, including cameras, mp3 players, and cellphones.) Moreover, using cargo pants at security, in my opinion, is a pain in the neck.</p>
<p>In the airport, I&#8217;m sticking to my vest. Beyond the above, a photographer&#8217;s vest has much more capacity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Packing your carry-ons defensively -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/packing-your-carry-ons-defensively/comment-page-1/#comment-19296</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Packing your carry-ons defensively -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumertraveler.com/?p=24635#comment-19296</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by UpTake, Robert Cole. Robert Cole said: Add cargo pants too? :) RT @UpTake: most brilliant idea ever: Photographer vest as a carry on. http://bit.ly/90uxGh [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by UpTake, Robert Cole. Robert Cole said: Add cargo pants too? :) RT @UpTake: most brilliant idea ever: Photographer vest as a carry on. <a href="http://bit.ly/90uxGh" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/90uxGh</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ned Levi</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/packing-your-carry-ons-defensively/comment-page-1/#comment-19287</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned Levi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumertraveler.com/?p=24635#comment-19287</guid>
		<description>I can only tell you the brands I&#039;ve used with which I&#039;m most happy with their performance. I actually have two photographer&#039;s vests; one for cold weather (black) and one for warm weather (khaki). The cold weather one is heavier fabric and gives me a little chest and back warmth, while the summer weather one has somewhat lighter weight cloth and more venting.

Both brands are of excellent quality, in my opinion, and I wouldn&#039;t hesitate to recommend either brand. One caveat is that when choosing each, I took into account their usefulness for me as a photographer, not just a traveler, so it&#039;s possible other brands would work for non-travelers.

My cold weather vest is a Tamrac World Correspondent&#039;s Vest, and my warm weather vest is a Domke PhoTOGS Vest. Both the vests come in multiple sizes. I sized the Tamrac for cold weather a bit on the large size so it can fit over my outerwear. Before purchasing one for yourself, you have to think about what you might wear under it. My dad has one, after he saw me use it on a non-photographic trip, though I&#039;m always taking photos but it wasn&#039;t my prime purpose for this trip. His will fit over or under a sports coat. He always travels in a sports coat, but that&#039;s his generation.

I hope this helps ARW. As always, I appreciate your comments, and your readership. I also look forward to your next excellent post in our CT forums. (While I may not always agree with your posts, they are always well thought out and appreciated.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only tell you the brands I&#8217;ve used with which I&#8217;m most happy with their performance. I actually have two photographer&#8217;s vests; one for cold weather (black) and one for warm weather (khaki). The cold weather one is heavier fabric and gives me a little chest and back warmth, while the summer weather one has somewhat lighter weight cloth and more venting.</p>
<p>Both brands are of excellent quality, in my opinion, and I wouldn&#8217;t hesitate to recommend either brand. One caveat is that when choosing each, I took into account their usefulness for me as a photographer, not just a traveler, so it&#8217;s possible other brands would work for non-travelers.</p>
<p>My cold weather vest is a Tamrac World Correspondent&#8217;s Vest, and my warm weather vest is a Domke PhoTOGS Vest. Both the vests come in multiple sizes. I sized the Tamrac for cold weather a bit on the large size so it can fit over my outerwear. Before purchasing one for yourself, you have to think about what you might wear under it. My dad has one, after he saw me use it on a non-photographic trip, though I&#8217;m always taking photos but it wasn&#8217;t my prime purpose for this trip. His will fit over or under a sports coat. He always travels in a sports coat, but that&#8217;s his generation.</p>
<p>I hope this helps ARW. As always, I appreciate your comments, and your readership. I also look forward to your next excellent post in our CT forums. (While I may not always agree with your posts, they are always well thought out and appreciated.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ned Levi</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/packing-your-carry-ons-defensively/comment-page-1/#comment-19285</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned Levi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumertraveler.com/?p=24635#comment-19285</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s certainly an option Hapgood, and during the short time the liquids and gels were completely banned, it&#039;s one that I took for specific items. Even now, if I have a particular photo shoot I&#039;m traveling to do, which requires a significant amount of equipment, which can&#039;t be taken as carry-on, I ship the equipment either FedEx or UPS in Pelican boxes, locked with numbered seals (if shipped internationally, or locked with a padlock if shipped domestically, wrapped in commercial shipping wrap, and fully insured. Of course, since I&#039;m going on business, to hopefully derive an income from the trip, that&#039;s different than shipping when the trip is only for pleasure.

In general, while I could ship my checked-in luggage, I&#039;m not inclined to do the same with my carry-on luggage. I normally carry in that, items which I use all the time, or are important enough that I want to hand carry them, myself. I never let anyone handle (carry) my personal bag (camera/computer), or my roller carry-on (other items mentioned in article). That has made many porters and bellmen unhappy all over, but that&#039;s the way it goes. They will have to settle for my checked-in baggage which I usually have as I&#039;m a heavy packer who dislikes having to buy items when away or do laundry.

I&#039;ve looked at shipping before, and it&#039;s more than a few pennies to do it for a 50# suitcase. For example, if I sent a 50# suitcase from the east coast to the west coast, valued at $1,500 via UPS, it would cost about $80 for ground (4 days shipping), $160 for select (3 days shipping), $240 for 2nd day air, or $270 for overnight saver. (If the value drops to $500, the savings is only about $10 per class (speed) of shipment. International shipments are more pricey.

While shipping would make it a bit easier at the airport with no luggage to check-in, it doesn&#039;t help me get through security, which is really the major hassle. So for now, it&#039;s status quo and packing defensively for me.

Thanks very much for your comment and your readership. I very much appreciate both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s certainly an option Hapgood, and during the short time the liquids and gels were completely banned, it&#8217;s one that I took for specific items. Even now, if I have a particular photo shoot I&#8217;m traveling to do, which requires a significant amount of equipment, which can&#8217;t be taken as carry-on, I ship the equipment either FedEx or UPS in Pelican boxes, locked with numbered seals (if shipped internationally, or locked with a padlock if shipped domestically, wrapped in commercial shipping wrap, and fully insured. Of course, since I&#8217;m going on business, to hopefully derive an income from the trip, that&#8217;s different than shipping when the trip is only for pleasure.</p>
<p>In general, while I could ship my checked-in luggage, I&#8217;m not inclined to do the same with my carry-on luggage. I normally carry in that, items which I use all the time, or are important enough that I want to hand carry them, myself. I never let anyone handle (carry) my personal bag (camera/computer), or my roller carry-on (other items mentioned in article). That has made many porters and bellmen unhappy all over, but that&#8217;s the way it goes. They will have to settle for my checked-in baggage which I usually have as I&#8217;m a heavy packer who dislikes having to buy items when away or do laundry.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve looked at shipping before, and it&#8217;s more than a few pennies to do it for a 50# suitcase. For example, if I sent a 50# suitcase from the east coast to the west coast, valued at $1,500 via UPS, it would cost about $80 for ground (4 days shipping), $160 for select (3 days shipping), $240 for 2nd day air, or $270 for overnight saver. (If the value drops to $500, the savings is only about $10 per class (speed) of shipment. International shipments are more pricey.</p>
<p>While shipping would make it a bit easier at the airport with no luggage to check-in, it doesn&#8217;t help me get through security, which is really the major hassle. So for now, it&#8217;s status quo and packing defensively for me.</p>
<p>Thanks very much for your comment and your readership. I very much appreciate both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arizona Road Warrior</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/packing-your-carry-ons-defensively/comment-page-1/#comment-19278</link>
		<dc:creator>Arizona Road Warrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumertraveler.com/?p=24635#comment-19278</guid>
		<description>Any recommendations for photographer’s vest (i.e. brands)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any recommendations for photographer’s vest (i.e. brands)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hapgood</title>
		<link>http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/packing-your-carry-ons-defensively/comment-page-1/#comment-19277</link>
		<dc:creator>Hapgood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumertraveler.com/?p=24635#comment-19277</guid>
		<description>It may turn out that the only effective &quot;defense&quot; against the utterly unpredictable whims of &quot;security&quot; and airline agents is shelling out a few more pennies to FedEx anything you can&#039;t do without. That will avoid much hassle at the airport and make flying that much less unpleasant. The airlines are working as hard as they can to &quot;unbundle&quot; every aspect of flying so they can generate enough ancillary revenue to prosper. The cost of FedExing belongings is just another fee, but one that at least includes insurance and accountability that isn&#039;t included with the airline&#039;s checked baggage fees. 

Of course, the best &quot;defensive&quot; solution is to choose a destination that doesn&#039;t require flying. But that&#039;s usually not a feasible option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may turn out that the only effective &#8220;defense&#8221; against the utterly unpredictable whims of &#8220;security&#8221; and airline agents is shelling out a few more pennies to FedEx anything you can&#8217;t do without. That will avoid much hassle at the airport and make flying that much less unpleasant. The airlines are working as hard as they can to &#8220;unbundle&#8221; every aspect of flying so they can generate enough ancillary revenue to prosper. The cost of FedExing belongings is just another fee, but one that at least includes insurance and accountability that isn&#8217;t included with the airline&#8217;s checked baggage fees. </p>
<p>Of course, the best &#8220;defensive&#8221; solution is to choose a destination that doesn&#8217;t require flying. But that&#8217;s usually not a feasible option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

