Honesty is the best advertising policy — today, airlines take the first steps

by Charlie Leocha on January 26, 2012

We’ve all seen that “great deal” airline ad, only to discover that with surcharges, taxes and fees, the great deal is not-so-great. Starting today, when airline consumers see an advertised price of $500 that will be the price they pay. (Of course, there will still be some additional irritating “optional” fees like baggage charges, seat reservations, etc.)

Here is a synopsis of new rule changes that came into effect in phases this Tuesday and today affecting airfares and airline fees.

Full-fare advertising

Starting today, all advertised airline prices will have to be the full cost of travel. Airlines are squirming, claiming that their business will suffer if they are required to advertise the full cost of travel and suggesting that consumers will be scared away when they see a jump in prices when this rule comes into effect. Consumers may see what seems to be an increase in prices, but it will only be transparent honesty that is to blame.

Many airlines and some analysts have argued that making airlines play by a different set of rules than other industries is, well, un-American. However, DOT has found itself all but forced to act because of the astounding discrepancies in the advertised price and the real price of airline travel.

On some domestic routes the difference will be minimal. On international routes the price increases may seem astronomical.

The price on Orbitz (Jan. 23rd) for a flight from Boston to London Heathrow departing on April 17th and returning April 24th is advertised with a $130 round-trip airfare! After airlines, airports and governments add on another $622 in taxes and fees, the total cost is $752.

Orbitz screen detail, January 23, 2012, $130 airfare + $622 taxes and fees

Priceline.com BOS-LHR display on Jan. 26, 2012 — much more honest and clear

Is it honest advertising to advertise a flight from Boston to London for $130 when the lowest cost to travel would be $752? I think everyone would agree that it is not.

Unfortunately, the slew of “optional fees,” especially such as baggage fees and seat reservation fees that can add more than a hundred dollars to the cost are still concealed from airline shoppers unless they do some digging. The airlines are not making comparison shopping easy when it comes to examining the full cost of travel across airlines, including optional fees. And, yes, consumer groups are encouraging DOT to mandate that airlines disclose, at least, baggage and reservation fee information before consumers have to press the “buy” button.

Exact baggage charges

• Passenger-specific baggage fees are now required on flight itineraries. Airlines must tell the passenger exactly what their baggage fee will be based on their frequent flier status, class of service, the credit card with which they purchased the airfare and take into account whether the passenger is traveling with others, on the same ticket record, who have benefits or dispensation that they can share.

Though airlines still refuse to disclose baggage fees that can be compared across airlines during the buying process, this measure will allow passengers to know what they will have to pay, rather than find themselves surprised at the airport.

Baggage fees across code-share and alliance flights

• The marketing carrier must provide passengers a common baggage charge that will apply throughout their trip when travel involves code-share and alliance partners. For instance, a ticket purchased on Delta Airlines may not involved any flights on Delta, but the Delta baggage rules will apply. If the first flight with a Delta flight number is on an Air France to Paris, the second is on Alitalia from Paris to Rome and the return flight from Rome via Amsterdam to the U.S. is on KLM, the Delta baggage rules will apply.

As confusing as domestic baggage fees have become, international baggage fees on a Delta-flight-number ticket used to be indecipherable. Now, consumers may get baggage fees that are comprehensible.

More new rules with important protections

Besides these new rules that come into effect this week regarding pricing, airlines must allow a 24-hour grace period to change airline tickets or cancel them after purchase. They will be forbidden from increasing prices after airfare purchase. And, airlines will be required to inform passengers of delays of 30 minutes or more, cancellations and diversions within 30 minutes of the carrier becoming aware of the change.

Finally, airline consumers are getting some respect.

A version of this story was published on CNN.com on January 25, 2012

Print Friendly

  • Anonymous

    Okay, Disqus is tossing any post I make with a link in it, so I’ll just limit myself to saying that Delta now has a banner over their search results that reads:

    One Price.  Period.
    Ticket prices on deltacom include all taxes.

    Improvement, but I’m guessing it still skims baggage fees.  I don’t have a flight to actually book today, so I don’t know if that’s further down in the process.

  • Lisaco1

    All air tickets prices are going up, because of this, What is missing ? Airlines must disclose how much of the price how much goes to the government(s), they will be able to increase prices more easily like in GAS.. One price and you don’t know how much of the increase is taxes or not..

  • Anonymous

    Really?  All ticket prices are going up?  What do you have to prove this statement?  Let’s not go with the sky is falling attitude.  Air fare, changes multiple times a day, in both directions.  Yes, if a total price was $750 today, vs $725 yesterday, you will have to compare to see where the change is.  We do this daily so nothing new for us, jsut new for online shoppers. But then, isn’t that for anything you are shopping for?

  • Frank

    Finally, airline consumers are getting some respect.
    —————————————————————————————-

    You turned yourselves into “travel agents” with the help of the internet.  Guess what?  It’s time consuming and it was NEVER an easy job.  I do find it interesting that OTHER industries arent forced to comply with this mindset.  After all, purchasing a phone plan, buying a car, having cable brought into your home all warrant multiple decisions and prices WITH taxes and fees.

    Bag fees?  there’s multiple websites that provide that information.  They irritate you?  Too bad.  This country has been in a horrible economic condition for 5 years now and I bet it’s one of the first times we havent seen a major carrier go under.  Exception, AA is currently ripping apart labor contracts right now, sending pay and benefits to a new low for them.  

    Taxes included?  What’s really so shocking is that taxes in this industry commonly go over 15% of airfare.  Govt’s turn to AIRLINES to raise revenue. 

    For travel within the United States, there are four basic taxes on airfares: a passenger ticket tax (7.5 percent of the base fare); a flight segment tax ($3.70 a flight); a passenger facility charge (up to $4.50 a segment); and a federal security fee, also called the Sept. 11 fee ($2.50 a segment). The first two taxes go to the Airport and Airway Trust Fund, which finances the Federal Aviation Administration; passenger facility charges are passed on to airports; and security fees finance the TSA.    

  • Anonymous

    One thing to bear in mind is that the airlines have moved their fuel surcharges from being part of the fare to being listed as a tax (YQ).  This may have been done for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to, how much they pay out in commissions, how much they can make it appear that the government is collecting on tickets, which can be substantial without the added YQ surcharges but when the YQ is $500.00, which is not uncommon on international flights, the taxes pale in comparison.  

    I just did a ticket from DFW to MNL and back, the total is $1341.50.  The base fare is $1034.00.  The YQ, which is listed as a tax but is a fuel surcharge, is $203.20. All of the actual taxes combined comes to $104.30.  
    The airlines are still being dishonest with consumers.  Somethings never change.

  • Anonymous

    I just did a ticket from DFW to MNL and back, the total is $1341.50.  The base fare is $1034.00.  The YQ, which is listed as a tax but is a fuel surcharge, is $203.20. All of the actual taxes combined comes to $104.30.

    You must have ticketed UA/CO/NH via Guam on one direction and via NRT on the other direction. The YQ would be $100 via GUM and $103.20 via NRT for a total of $203.20.
     
    That (~$200) actually is one of the lowest (if not the lowest) fuel/insurance surcharge levied by any airline for a USA to MNL route. Delta, Korean and Asian charges ~$360, and Singapore Airlines a whopping $620. Only the Chinese airlines come close; CA/220, CI/250, BR/250,  CZ/221. [Figures are round trip.]

    Now let’s compare the fuel surcharge CO/UA charges to Asia (MNL) to what they charge to Europe (Paris CDG) …

    Ticketed Point Mileage (TPM) for DFW to Paris is
    DFWPAR  4940
    and they charge a 238YQ per direction
    So the YQ per mile is $0.048178

    Ticketed Point Mileage (TPM) for DFW to Manila via Guam is 
    DFWHNL  3784    HNLGUM  3797    GUMMNL  1596TOTAL    9177
    and they charge a 100YQ per direction over that route
    So the YQ per mile is $0.010897

    They charge almost 4.5 times more fuel surcharge to Europe per mile. Why so? Just because they can?

Previous post:

Next post: